Comparison of Intubating Supraglottic Airways LMA Fastrach™ and ILTS-D® under Normal and Simulated Difficult Airways — a Manikin Study

A.A. Andreenko, I.N. Grachev, I.I. Faizov

Federal State Budgetary Educational Military Institution of Higher Professional Education Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg

For correspondence: Andreenko Aleksander Aleksandrovich — Candidate of Medical Science, deputy chief of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Federal State Budgetary Educational Military Institution of Higher Professional Education Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg; e-mail: adminfar@rambler.ru

For citation: Andreenko AA, Grachev IN, Faizov II. Comparison of Intubating Supraglottic Airways LMA Fastrach™ and iLTS-D® under Normal and Simulated Difficult Airways — a Manikin Study. Intensive Care Herald. 2017;1:12–18.


The goal of study was to compare the effectiveness of using Fastrach ™ and iLTS-D® on a manikin by novices 1st year resident-anesthesiologists under normal and simulated difficult airways. At the first stage the participants conducted four consecutive trials on a manikin. Each trial included insertion, ventilation and blind intubation the manikin using iLTS-D® and Fastrach™. ‘Time to ventilation’, ‘time to tracheal ventilation’, success rates and number of attempts were recorded for the both devices. At the second stage participants performed one attempt of ventilation and blind intubation under simulated difficult airways (midline head stabilization and limited mouth opening 3 cm). It was estimated the difference between devices in ‘time to ventilation’ and ‘time to tracheal ventilation’; differences in success rates at trial 4 and at the second stage. There was no difference in ‘time to ventilation’ between either device in trial 4 (median: Fastrach: 14.7 s, iLTS-D: 13.2 s, p = 0.14). Also there was no difference in ‘time to tracheal ventilation’ between either device in trial 4 (median: Fastrach: 15.4 s., iLTS-D: 13.9 s, p = 0.55). Both devices were equally effective in a simulated difficult airway, ventilation and intubation at the first attempt was successful in all cases, there was no significant difference in ‘time to ventilation’ (Fastrach: 12.3 s, iLTS-D: 13.5 s, p = 0.14) and ‘time to tracheal ventilation’ (Fastrach: 12.6 s, iLTS-D: 12.5 s, p = 0.77).

Keywords: airway management, intubating laryngeal tube, intubating laryngeal mask, patient simulation, difficult airway, airway management training

Received: 26.02.2017


References

  1. Frerk C., Mitchell V.S., Mcnarry A.F., Mendonca C. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br. J. Anaesth. 2015; 115(6): 827–848. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371.
  2. Андреенко А.А., Долбнева Е.Л., Мизиков В.М., Стамов В.И. Обеспечение проходимости верхних дыхательных путей в стационаре. В кн.: Клинические рекомендации. Анестезиология-реаниматология: Под ред. И.Б. Заболотских, Е.М. Шифмана. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016: 616–649.
  3. Schalte G., Stoppe C., Aktas M. et al. Laypersons can successfully place supraglottic airways with 3 minutes of training. A comparison of four different devices in the manikin. Scand. J. Trauma Resus. 2011; 19: 60. doi: 10.1186/1757–7241–19–60.
  4. Tritsch L., Boet S., Pottecher J., Joshi G.P., Diemunsch P. Intubating laryngeal mask airway placement by non-physician healthcare providers in management out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A case series. Resuscitation. 2013; 85(3): 320–325. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.006.
  5. Долбнева Е.Л. Интубирующая ларингеальная маска (LMA fastrach) А.Брейна: К вопросу о стандартном способе установки. Вестник интенсивной терапии: Научно-практический журнал. 2010; 1: 3–11.
  6. Долбнева Е.Л. Интубирующая ларингеальная маска А. Брэйна и «трудные» дыхательные пути: современное состояние проблемы. Медицина неотложных состояний. 2012; 1(40): 29–34.
  7. Timmermann A., Russo S.G., Crozier T.A. et al. Novices ventilate and intubate quicker and safer via intubating laryngeal mask than by conventional bag–mask ventilation and laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2007; 107(4): 570–576.
  8. Андреенко А.А., Лобачев И.В., Макаренко Е.П., Щеголев А.В. Применение современных образовательных технологий в процессе обучения анестезиологов-реаниматологов по программе учебного модуля «Трудные дыхательные пути». Вестник Российской Военно-медицинской академии. 2015; 1(49): 221–226.
  9. iLTS-D: Intubating laryngeal tube with drain tube. URL: https://www.vbm-medical.com/products/airway-management/intubating-laryngeal-tube-ilts-d
  10. Genzwurker Neuheit iLTS-D: Ein Larynxtubus mit Moglichkeit zum Intubieren. Rettungsdienst. 2015; 7: 678–679.
  11. Brain A.I.J. The Laryngeal Mask LMA Fastrach™: Instruction Manual. Reading: LMA Medical, 2006.
  12. Sunde G.A., Brattebo G., Odegarden T. et al. Laryngeal tube use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by paramedics in Norway. Scand. J. Trauma Resus. 2012; 20: 84. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-84.
  13. Jordan G.M., Silsby J., Bayley G., Cook T.M. Difficult Airway S. Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62(7): 708–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05069.x
  14. Долбнева Е.Л., Стамов В.И., Гаврилов С.В., Мизиков В.М. Эффективность применения интубирующей ларингеальной маски у пациентов с ожирением и повышенной массой тела. Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2013; 2: 58–63.
  15. Ott T., Fischer M., Limbach T. et al. The novel intubating laryngeal tube (iLTS-D®) is comparable to the intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) — a prospective randomised manikin study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2015; 23: 44. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0126-y.
  16. Boedeker B.H., Wadman M.C., Barak-Bernhagen M.A., Magruder T. 5th, Nicholas T.A. 4th. Using the intubating laryngeal tube in a manikin-user evaluation of a new airway device. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2013; 184: 56–58.
  17. Bernhard M., Beres W., Timmermann A. et al. Prehospital airway management using the laryngeal tube. An emergency department point of view. Anaesthesist. 2014; 63(7): 589–596. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2348-1.