Recommendation number | Statement to be changed | Suggested change | Explanation for the authors of the recommendations |
---|---|---|---|
1 | In a patient with acute respiratory failure, based on the
pathophysiology of respiratory failure, the technology of non-invasive
mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and data from evidence-based medicine studies,
its use is recommended for the following pathologies:
|
In a patient with acute respiratory failure, the use of non-invasive
mechanical ventilation is recommended for the following critical conditions:
|
Specify the PEEP/CPAP
values. Clarify or give clinical examples of immunosuppressive conditions. For example: NIV can be successfully used in immunosuppressive conditions, for example, in severe pneumonia [Hilbert G., Gruson D., Vargas F., et al. Noninvasive ventilation in immunosuppressed patients with pulmonary infiltrates, fever, and acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(7): 481–7], hypoxemic respiratory failure in [Rathi N.K., Haque S.A., Nates R., et al. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation vs invasive mechanical ventilation as first-line therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in cancer patients. J Crit Care. 2017; 39: 56–61], Graft-versus-host reactions [Cortegiani A., Madotto F., Gregoretti C., et al. Immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: secondary analysis of the LUNG SAFE database. Crit Care. 2018; 22(1): 157]. NIV reduces in-hospital and 30-day mortality in immunodeprimed patients [Wang T., Zhang L., Luo K., et al. Noninvasive versus invasive mechanical ventilation for immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2016; 16(1): 129]. At the same time, immunosuppressive conditions are not predictors of NIV ineffectiveness and do not lead to an increased risk of tracheal intubation [Coudroy R., Pham T., Boissier F., et al. Is immunosuppression status a risk factor for noninvasive ventilation failure in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? A post hoc matched analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2019; 9(1): 90. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-019-0566-z] |
2 | In patients with acute respiratory failure who are indicated for NIVL, its use is recommended only under the following conditions: preservation of consciousness, the ability to cooperate with staff, the absence of claustrophobia (when using helmets) and the functioning of the entire mechanism of coughing up sputum | In patients with ARF, the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation is recommended only under the following conditions: preservation of consciousness, the ability to cooperate with staff, the absence of claustrophobia (with the use of helmets) and the ability to cough up phlegm | |
4 | In patients with ARF, the use of NIV instead of oxygen therapy (through a face mask or cannula) is recommended to improve gas exchange, reduce respiratory activity and improve prognosis in the following conditions: exacerbation of COPD (with the development of moderate respiratory acidosis (7.35 > pH > 7.25) and compensated ARF) | Supplement the information with the criteria of compensated ARF | |
6 | In patients with severe exacerbation of bronchial asthma, NIV is not recommended, drug therapy in combination with oxygen therapy is indicated, and with the progression of ARF (life-threatening asthma), only invasive mechanical ventilation is recommended, NIV is contraindicated | In severe exacerbation of bronchial asthma, drug and oxygen therapy are indicated. With the progression of the condition — invasive mechanical ventilation. NIV is contraindicated. | |
8 | In patients with hypoxemic (parenchymal) ARF, non-invasive mechanical ventilation is recommended with a combination of low alveoli recruitment with slightly reduced or normal compliance of the lungs and chest wall (primary pathology of the lung parenchyma) as first-line therapy, especially in immunosuppressed patients; It is possible that high-flow oxygen therapy has an advantage in this category of patients. These conditions include: community-acquired pneumonia with an initial oxygenation index of more than 150 mm Hg. | In patients with hypoxemic (parenchymal) ARF, non-invasive mechanical ventilation is recommended with a combination of low alveoli recruitment with slightly reduced or normal compliance of the lungs and chest wall (primary pathology of the lung parenchyma) as first-line therapy, especially in patients with immunosuppression (perhaps high-flow oxygen therapy has an advantage in this category of patients) | In the context of new data on NIV in a new coronavirus infection, remove the indication of the presence of an oxygenation index of more than 150 mm Hg |
11 | In patients at risk (COPD with hypercapnia, obesity with hypercapnia, congestive heart failure) after surgery, NIV is recommended to prevent the development of post-extubation ARF, it leads to a decrease in the frequency of tracheal intubations and a decrease in mortality; the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in these groups of patients with already developed post-extubation ARF is ineffective and can lead to delayed tracheal intubation and worsening of the prognosis | In patients at risk (COPD with hypercapnia, obesity with hypercapnia, congestive heart failure) after surgery, NIV is recommended to prevent the development of ARF, it leads to a decrease in the frequency of tracheal intubations and a decrease in mortality | |
12 | Non-invasive respiratory support is not recommended in the following
cases (confidence level of evidence 3, level of persuasiveness of
recommendations B): 1) lack of spontaneous breathing (apnea); 2) unstable hemodynamics (hypotension, ischemia or myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmia, uncontrolled arterial hypertension); 3) inability to provide airway protection (coughing and swallowing disorders) and high risk of aspiration; 4) excessive bronchial secretion; 5) signs of impaired consciousness (excitation or depression of consciousness), the patient's inability to cooperate with medical personnel; 6) facial trauma, burns, anatomical abnormalities that prevent the mask use; 7) severe obesity; 8) the patient's inability to remove the mask from the face in case of vomiting; 9) active bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract; 10) upper airway obstruction; 11) discomfort from the mask; 12) upper respiratory tract surgery |
NIV is not recommended in the following cases: 1) lack of spontaneous breathing (apnea); 2) unstable hemodynamics (hypotension, ischemia or myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmia, uncontrolled arterial hypertension); 3) inability to provide airway protection (coughing and swallowing disorders) and high risk of aspiration; 4) excessive bronchial secretion; 5) signs of impaired consciousness (excitation or depression of consciousness, score according to RASS > + 1 or from –3 to –5), the patient's inability to cooperate with medical personnel; 6) facial trauma, burns, anatomical abnormalities that prevent the mask use; 7) severe obesity; 8) the patient's inability to remove the mask from the face in case of vomiting; 9) active GI bleeding; 10) upper airway obstruction; 11) discomfort from the mask; 12) upper respiratory tract surgery |
The amended text is in italics in paragraph 5, represented by data from the RASS scale (level of certainty of evidence 2, level of persuasiveness of recommendations B) [9–11] |
17 | In patients with anticipated difficult tracheal intubation, the use of high-flow oxygenation is recommended, as this reduces the incidence of desaturation during tracheal intubation | In patients with anticipated difficult tracheal intubation, the use of high-flow oxygenation is recommended | |
18 | In patients undergoing palliative care high-flow oxygenation is recommended as this avoids mechanical ventilation | In patients undergoing palliative care HFO is recommended as mechanical ventilation is not indicated for this category of patients |