Дексмедетомидин и пропофол для седации при каротидной эндартерэктомии в условиях регионарной анестезии: что лучше для пациента? (исследование удовлетворенности пациентов)

Дмитрий Иванович Томащук; Д. В. Мартынов; В. М. Женило

doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2017-4-36-41

No. 4 (2017), SEDATION

No. 4 (2017)

SEDATION

Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Carotid Endarterectomy Under Regional Anesthesia: What’s Better for the Patient? (Study of Patient Satisfaction)

Published 25.12.2017

Dmitry I. Tomaschuk⁺⁻
D.V. Martynov⁺⁻
V.M. Zhenilo⁺⁻

Dmitry I. Tomaschuk

Rostov State Medical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5613-6167

D.V. Martynov

Rostov State Medical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-5274

V.M. Zhenilo

Rostov State Medical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0576-1565

PDF_2017-4_36-41 (Russian)

Keywords

dexmedetomidine
carotid endarterectomy
regional anesthesia with sedation
patient satisfaction

How to Cite

1.

Tomaschuk D.I., Martynov D.V., Zhenilo V.M. Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Carotid Endarterectomy Under Regional Anesthesia: What’s Better for the Patient? (Study of Patient Satisfaction). Annals of Critical Care. 2017;(4):36-41. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2017-4-36-41

Statistic

Abstract Views: 71
PDF_2017-4_36-41 (Russian) Downloads: 47

Statistic from 01.07.2024

Language

Most reader

Abstract

Introduction. Carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia with sedation allows to realize dynamic neurologic monitoring. The main drawback of this approach is patient’s discomfort. Thus, qualitative sedation at the operation of carotid endarterectomy in case of regional anesthesia is necessary. The use of dexmedetomidine as a basic preparation for perioperative sedation is especially interesting as it has a unique effect on the central nervous system. Material and methods. 112 patients were involved and divided into two groups: group № 1 (propofol group) and group № 2 (dexmedetomidine group) in proportion 53 vs 59. There were no differences between the groups (p = 0.36). In the group № 1 after performing regional anesthesia we started the propofol infusion (TCI) up to the target level of 1.7 mg/ml in plasma. The patents from group № 2 began to receive dexmedetomidine at the rate from 0.2 mkg/kg/h to 0.9–1 mkg/kg/h by the end of regional anesthesia. Patient’s satisfaction with anesthesia was assessed according to their answers to the questionnaire on the next day after the operation. Results. Almost two thirds of patients, 38 people (64.40 %), from group № 2 expressed their satisfaction (13–15 points) with anesthesia they received, while in the group № 1 only 11 people (20.75 %) got 13–15 points (p < 0.0001); 37 people (69.81 %) from group № 1 got 10–12 points and 19 people (32.20 %) from group № 2 (p = 0.0001). Less than 10 points (“unsatisfied”) were given by 5 (9.43 %) patients from group № 1, and 2 (3.38 %) patients from group № 2, there are no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.3). It should be mentioned that all patients who considered their presence in the operating room to be uncomfortable (3 people) had also a low sum of points (< 10), which indicates the imperfection of the offered questionnaire. Conclusion. Though the patients who received dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent, had a less deep sedation and had more memories of DNM stage, in total showed comparative satisfaction with the group receiving propofol. Moreover, there were significantly more patients completely satisfied with anesthesia in the dexmedetomidine group.

PDF_2017-4_36-41 (Russian)

References

Куликов А.С., Шмигельский А.В., Лубнин А.Ю. Седация дексмедетомидином при проведении каротидной эндартерэктомии в сознании. Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. Т. 2013; 4: 30–34. [Kulikov A.S., Shmigel’skiy A.V., Lubnin A.Yu. Dexmedetomidine sedation for awake carotid endarterectomy. Vol. VII. 2013; 4: 30–34. (In Russ)]
Licker M. Regional or general anaesthesia for carotid endarter Does it matter? European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2016; 33: 241–243. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000376.
Stoneham M.D., Stamou D., Mason J. Regional anaesthesia for carotid British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015; 114(3): 372–383. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu304.
Wilke H.J., Ellis J.E., McKinsey J.F. Carotid endarterectomy: intraoperative anaesthesia and Journal Cardiothoracic Vascular Anaesthesia. 1996; 10: 928–949. doi: 10.1016/ s1053-0770(96)80060-7.
Quigley T.M., Ryan W.R., Morgan S. Patient satisfaction after carotid endarterectomy using a selective policy of local anaesthesia. American Journal of Surgery. 2000; 179(5): 382–385. doi: 1016/s0002-9610(00)00371-8.
McCarthy J., Trigg R., John C., Gough M.J., Horrocks M. Patient satisfaction for carotid endarterectomy performed under local anaesthesia. European Journal Vascular Endovascular Surgery. 2004; 27(6): 654–659. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.03.010.
Attigah N., Kutter J., Demirel S., Hakimi M., Hinz U. et al. Assessment of patients satisfaction in carotid surgery under local anaesthesia by psychometrical testing. A prospective cohort study. European Journal Vascular Endovascular Surgery. 2011; 41(1): 76–82. doi: 1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.020.
Marcucci G., Siani A., Accrocca F., Gabrielli R., Giorda- no A. et al. Preserved consciousness in general anesthesia during carotid endarterectomy: a six-year experience. Interactive Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery Journal [Internet]. 2011; 13(6): 601–605. doi: 1510/icvts.2011.280321.
Martin E., Ramsay G., Mantz J., Sum-Ping S.T. The role of the a2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine in postsurgical sedation in the intensive care unit. Journal Intensive Care Med. 2003; 18: 29–41. doi: 1177/0885066602239122.
Venn R.M., Grounds R.N. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: Patient and clinician perceptions. British Journal of Anesthesia. 2001; 87: 684–690. doi: 1093/bja/87.5.684.
Ebert T.J., Hall J.E., Barney J.A., Uhrich T.D., Colinco M.D. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93: 382–394. doi: 1097/00000542-200008000-00016.
Hall J.E., Uhrich T.D., Barney J.A., Arain S.R., Ebert T.J. Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine Anesthesia Analgesia. 2000; 90: 699–705. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00035.
Ji F., Li Z., Nguyen H., Young N., Shi P., Fleming N. et al. Perioperative dexmedetomidine improves outcomes of cardiac surgery. 2013; 128: e339–e340. doi: 10.1161/CIR- CULATIONAHA.113.005450.
Benggon M., Chen H., Applegate R., Martin R., Zhang J.H. Effect of dexmedetomidine on brain edema and neurological outcomes in surgical brain injury in rats. Anesthesia Analgesia. 2012; 115: 154–159. doi: 1213/ANE.0b013e31824e2b86.
Zhu Y.M., Wang C.C., Chen L., Qian L.B., Ma L.L .et a Both PI3K/Akt and ERK1/2 pathways participate in the protection by dexmedetomidine against transient focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Brain. Res. 2013; 1494: 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.11.047.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Igor B. Zabolotskikh, N.V. Trembach, M.A. Magomedov, A.S. Popov, Yu.P. Malyshev, A.A. Dmitriev, E.V. Grigoryev, V.V. Fisher, V.E. Khoronenko, V.N. Kokhno, A.P. Spasova, V.R. Davydova, A.I. Gritsan, K.M. Lebedinskii, P.V. Dunts, A.Zh. Bayalieva, A.M. Ovezov, D.V. Martynov, N.G. Arikan, M.Yu. Kirov, V.I. Ershov, I.N. Pasechnik, A.N. Kuzovlev, D.E. Fedunets, Structure and frequency of comorbidities and associated postoperative complications: a national observational multicenter study STOPRISK , Annals of Critical Care: No. 3 (2023)
Roman E. Lakhin, A.A. Andreenko, A.V. Vlasenko, D.V. Martynov, V.V. Lazarev, A.M. Ovezov, V.I. Gorbachev, I.N. Leiderman, A.A. Belkin, V.V. Fisher, V.V. Lomivorotov, V.V. Kuzkov, E.M. Shifman, E.V. Grigoryev, A.S. Popov, M.A. Magomedov, A.I. Yaroshetskiy, Modified Delphi analysis of the clinical guideline “Sedation of patients in the departments of anesthesiology, intensive care and intensive care” , Annals of Critical Care: No. 2 (2023)
R.V. Veyler, N.V. Trembach, T.S. Musaeva, M.A. Magomedov, A.S. Popov, V.V. Fisher, V.E. Khoronenko, A.I. Gritsan, P.V. Dunts, A.Zh. Bayalieva, A.M. Ovezov, K.M. Lebedinskii, D.V. Martynov, A.P. Spasova, V.V. Stadler, D.A. Levit, K.G. Shapovalov, V.N. Kokhno, V.V. Golubtsov, Igor B. Zabolotskikh, Prediction model for postoperative pneumonia in abdominal surgery: results of an observational multicenter study , Annals of Critical Care: No. 4 (2023)
Igor B. Zabolotskikh, N.V. Trembach, M.A. Magomedov, V.G. Krasnov, L.Yu. Chernienko, S.N. Shevyrev, A.S. Popov, E.V. Tyutyunova, S.N. Vatutin, Yu.P. Malyshev, E.A. Popov, A.A. Smolin, I.Z. Kitiashvili, A.A. Dmitriev, E.V. Grigoryev, E.A. Kameneva, V.V. Fisher, E.V. Volkov, I.V. Yatsuk, D.A. Levit, A.M. Sharipov, V.E. Khoronenko, M.M. Shemetova, V.N. Kokhno, E.V. Polovnikov, A.P. Spasova, A.V. Mironov, V.R. Davydova, K.G. Shapovalov, A.I. Gritsan, S.V. Sorsunov, K.M. Lebedinskii, P.V. Dunts, V.A. Rudnov, V.V. Stadler, A.Zh. Bayalieva, M.V. Prigorodov, V.F. Antonov, D.G. Voroshin, A.M. Ovezov, A.A. Pivovarova, D.V. Martynov, O.A. Batigyan, M.N. Zamyatin, S.E. Voskanyan, A.A. Astakhov, A.Zh. Khoteev, D.N. Protsenko, N.G. Arikan, I.A. Zakharchenko, A.S. Matveev, I.A. Trembach, T.S. Musaeva, Comparative evaluation of scales for predicting an unfavorable postoperative outcome: Preliminary results of the multicenter study “The role of concomitant diseases in the stratification of the risk of postoperative complications in abdominal surgery STOPRISK” , Annals of Critical Care: No. 3 (2022)
Igor B. Zabolotskikh, N.V. Trembach, M.A. Magomedov, V.G. Krasnov, L.Yu. Chernienko, S.N. Shevyrev, A.S. Popov, E.V. Tyutyunova, S.N. Vatutin, Yu.P. Malyshev, E.A. Popov, A.A. Smolin, I.Z. Kitiashvili, A.A. Dmitriev, E.V. Grigoryev, E.A. Kameneva, V.V. Fisher, E.V. Volkov, D.A. Levit, A.M. Sharipov, V.E. Khoronenko, M.M. Shemetova, V.N. Kokhno, E.V. Polovnikov, A.P. Spasova, A.V. Mironov, V.R. Davydova, K.G. Shapovalov, A.I. Gritsan, K.M. Lebedinskii, P.V. Dunts, V.A. Rudnov, V.V. Stadler, A.Zh. Bayalieva, M.V. Prigorodov, D.G. Voroshin, A.M. Ovezov, D.V. Martynov, M.N. Zamyatin, S.E. Voskanyan, A.A. Astakhov, A.Zh. Khoteev, D.N. Protsenko, Possibilities of preoperative assessment of the risk of an adverse outcomes after abdominal surgery: preliminary results of the multicenter STOPRISK study , Annals of Critical Care: No. 4 (2020)
Olesya A. Batigyan, E.A. Lebedeva, D.V. Martynov, Possibilities of transesophageal echocardiography for assessing the volemic status of patients during direct myocardial revascularization operations on the beating heart: a review , Annals of Critical Care: No. 4 (2021)
Yury V. Khoronko, D.V. Martynov, E.V. Kosovtsev, Yu.I. Lebedev, Perioperative Support of Portosystemic Shunting Interventions in Complicated Portal Hypertension due to Liver Cirrhosis , Annals of Critical Care: No. 1 (2017)
V.M. Zhenilo, A.V. Khripun, I.V. Kladova, D.V. Martynov, Dmitriy S. Kostyukov, K.A. Bondarenko, Experience in the use of cerebral oximetry at the stages of early rehabilitation of patients with ischemic stroke , Annals of Critical Care: No. 3 (2018)

Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Carotid Endarterectomy Under Regional Anesthesia: What’s Better for the Patient? (Study of Patient Satisfaction)

Keywords

How to Cite

Statistic

Language

block-menu

ARCHIVE

Abstract

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Carotid Endarterectomy Under Regional Anesthesia: What’s Better for the Patient? (Study of Patient Satisfaction)

Keywords

How to Cite

Download Citation

Statistic

Language

block-menu

ARCHIVE

Social Networks

Abstract

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)