Analgesic efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of morphine in patients after hip and knee joint endoprosthetics: prospective study
ISSN (print) 1726-9806     ISSN (online) 1818-474X
#2021-3
PDF_2021-3_133-139 (Russian)
HTML_2021-3_133-139 (Russian)

Keywords

arthroplasty replacement hip
arthroplasty replacement knee
morphine
infusions intravenous
analgesia
pain management

How to Cite

1.
Govorova N.V., Zverev S.A., Orlov Y.P., Klementyev A.V., Baytugaeva G.A. Analgesic efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of morphine in patients after hip and knee joint endoprosthetics: prospective study. Annals of Critical Care. 2021;(3):133-139. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2021-3-133-139

Statistic

Abstract Views: 81
PDF_2021-3_133-139 (Russian) Downloads: 42
HTML_2021-3_133-139 (Russian) Downloads: 52
Statistic from 01.07.2024

Language

English Русский

Social Networks

Abstract

Objectives of the study was to evaluate the possibility of using and the frequency of side effects of continuous intravenous morphine infusion for patients after arthroplasty of the lower limbs joints. Materials and methods. In the prospective study the results of treatment of 2 groups of patients were compared: after total knee arthroplasty (n = 52) and after total hip arthroplasty (n = 52). The rate of morphine administration in the total knee arthroplasty group ranged from 0.6 to 1.6 mg/hour, in the total knee arthroplasty group it was from 0.4 to 1.4 mg/hour. Continuous infusion of morphine was continued 24 hours after surgery. Indicators of systemic hemodynamics, gas exchange, pain and sedation were recorded. Results. The use of the technique of continuous intravenous infusion of morphine has shown the adequate level of anesthesia. An optimal balance between adequate analgesia, sedation and the absence of respiratory depression can only be achieved through a low rate of morphine administration. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and side effects (nausea, vomiting, acute urinary retention, delirium) in the groups with knee and hip arthroplasty. Conclusion. The technique provided, on the one hand, a good analgesic effect and sedation, but on the other hand, it was quite laborious and required careful monitoring of the parameters of the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. It is especially necessary to carefully monitor the indicators of vital functions in the evening and night hours.

PDF_2021-3_133-139 (Russian)
HTML_2021-3_133-139 (Russian)

References

  1. Борисов Д.Б., Киров М.Ю. Эндопротезирование тазобедренного и коленного суставов: эпидемиологические аспекты и влияние на качество жизни. Экология человека. 2013; 8: 52–7. [Borisov D.B., Kirov M.Yu. Hip and knee replacement: epidemiological aspects and impact on quality of life. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2013; 8: 52–7. (In Russ)]
  2. Курганский А.В., Храпов К.Н. Подходы к послеоперационному обезболиванию при операциях тотального эндопротезирования коленного и тазобедренного суставов. Вестник анестезиологии иреаниматологии. 2018; 15(4): 76–85. DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-4-76-85 [Kurganskiy A.V., Khrapov K.N. Approaches to postoperative analgesia in total knee and hip replacement operations. Vestnik anesteziologii i reanimatologii. 2018; 15(4): 76–85. DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-4-76-85 (In Russ)]
  3. Овечкин А.М., БаялиеваА.Ж., Ежевская А.А. и др. Послеоперационное обезболивание. Клинические рекомендации. Вестник интенсивной терапии имени А.И. Салтанова. 2019; 4: 9–33. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2019-4-9-33 [Ovechkin A.M., Bayalieva A.Zh., Ezhevskaya A.A., et al. Postoperative analgesia. Clinical recommendations. Annals of Critical Care. 2019; 4: 9–33. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2019-4-9-33 (In Russ)]
  4. Овечкин А.М., Политов М.Е., Панов Н.В. Острый и хронический послеоперационный болевой синдром у пациентов, перенесших тотальное эндопротезирование суставов нижних конечностей. Анестезиология иреаниматология. 2017; 62(3): 224–30. DOI: 10.18821/0201-7563-2017-62-3-224-230 [Ovechkin A.M., Politov M.E., Panov N.V. Acute and chronic postoperative pain syndrome in patients who have undergone total joint replacement of the lower extremities. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2017; 62(3): 224–30. DOI: 10.18821/0201-7563-2017-62-3-224-230 (In Russ)]
  5. Ohnhaus E., Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975; 1(4): 379–84. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5
  6. Ramsay M., Savege T., Simpson B., et al. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br. Med. J. 1974; 2(920): 656–9. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656
  7. Гланц С. Медико-биологическая статистика. М.: Практика, 1998. — 460 с. [Glants S. Biomedical statistics. M.: Praktika, 1998. — 460 s. (In Russ)]
  8. Marret E., Kurdi O., Zufferey P., et al. Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on patient-controlled analgesia morphine side effects: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology, 2005; 102(6): 1249–60. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200506000-00027
  9. Roberts G., Bekker T., Carlsen H., et al. Postoperative nausea and vomiting are strongly influenced by postoperative opioid use in a dose-related manner. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2005; 101(5): 1343–8. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000180204.64588.ec
  10. «Анестезия» Рональда Миллера. СПб: Человек, 2015. Т. 2. 854 с. [Miller’s Anesthesia. SPb: Chelovek; 2015. T. 2. 854 s. (In Russ)]
  11. Smart J.A., Pallaett E.J., Duthie D.J. Breath interval as a measure of dynamic opioid effect. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2000. 84: 735–8. DOI:1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013584
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 ANNALS OF CRITICAL CARE