Blockade of the carotid sinus in endovascular surgery of the internal carotid arteries: why and to whom? Prospective single-center study
ISSN (print) 1726-9806     ISSN (online) 1818-474X
#2021-4
PDF_2021-4_106-114 (Russian)
HTML_2021-4_106-114 (Russian)

Keywords

carotid stenosis
carotid sinus
syncope
baroreceptor reflex
asystole
hypotension
balloon angioplasty
stents
nerve block

How to Cite

1.
Polishchuk R.V., Piradov M.A., Ryabinkina Y.V., Shchipakin V.L., Koshcheev A.Y. Blockade of the carotid sinus in endovascular surgery of the internal carotid arteries: why and to whom? Prospective single-center study. Annals of Critical Care. 2022;(4):106-114. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2021-4-106-114

Statistic

Abstract Views: 53
PDF_2021-4_106-114 (Russian) Downloads: 30
HTML_2021-4_106-114 (Russian) Downloads: 25
Statistic from 01.07.2024

Language

English Русский

Social Networks

Abstract

Introduction. The widespread use of transluminal balloon angioplasty with stenting of the internal carotid arteries as part of the prevention of ischemic stroke has led to an increase in the number of publications in the world literature indicating the development of carotid sinus syndrome (“hemodynamic instability”) in the perioperative period, cerebral and cardiac complications, and deaths. requires the development of other approaches to providing medical care to patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis. Objectives. To assess the efficacy and safety of carotid sinus blockade when performing angioplasty with stenting of the internal carotid arteries and to determine indications for its implementation. Materials and Methods. The study included 120 patients with atherosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid arteries who underwent transluminal balloon angioplasty with stenting. 60 of them underwent carotid sinus blockade. Results. The incidence of SCS in the group of patients with BCS was 68.3 % (n = 41) versus 71.6 % (n = 43) in the group of patients without BCS (p > 0.05). However, none of the patients who underwent BCS had asystole and AV block (p < 0.05). With vasodepressor and cardio-inhibitory types, there is no significant difference in the time of occurrence of SCS between the groups (p > 0.05). With the most frequently developing type of SCS, mixed, the incidence of SCS with balloon dilatation is significantly lower with BCS — 16.7 % (BCS) versus 83.3 % (without BCS) (p < 0.05). When performing BCS in the group without SCS, in all cases there was no contralateral occlusion of the ICA (p < 0.05). Conclusions. BCS does not prevent the development of SCS, but eliminates such life-threatening complications as asystole and AV block. BCS can be indicated in patients with a history of cardiac pathology and is inappropriate for contralateral carotid occlusion.

PDF_2021-4_106-114 (Russian)
HTML_2021-4_106-114 (Russian)

References

  1. Бокерия Л.А., Покровский А.В., Сокуренко Г.Ю. и др. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с заболеваниями брахиоцефальных артерий. Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия 2013; 19. [Bokeriya L.A., Pokrovskiy A.V., Sokurenko G.Yu., et al. National guidelines for the management of patients with diseases of the brachiocephalic arteries. Angiology and Vascular Surgery 2013; 19. (In Russ)]
  2. Mendelsohn F.O., Weissman N.J., Lederman R.J., et al. Acute hemodynamic changes during carotid artery stenting. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1077–81. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00562-1
  3. de Borst G., Moll F. Commentary: Hemodynamic Instability Induced by Carotid Artery Stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2013; 20(1): 61–3. DOI: 10.1583/12-1
  4. Altinbas A., Algra A., Brown M.M., et al. Effects of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on hemodynamic complications in the International Carotid Stenting Study: a randomized comparison. International Journal of Stroke. 2014; 9: 284–90. DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12089
  5. Noori V.J., Aranson N.J., Malas M., et al. Risk factors and impact of postoperative hypotension after carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 73(3): 975–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.116
  6. Czermak J. Ueber mechanische Vagus Reizung beim Menschen. Jenaische Ztschr. f. Med. u. Naturwiss. 1866; 2: 384–455.
  7. Weiss S., Baker J.P. The carotid sinus reflex in health and disease. Its role in the causation of fainting and convulsions. Medicine. 1933; 12(3): 297–354. DOI: 10.1097/00005792-193309000-00003
  8. Strasberg B., Sagie A., Erdman S., et al. Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity and the Carotid Sinus Syndrome. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 1989; 31(5): 379–91. DOI: 10.1016/0033-0620(89)90032-7
  9. УсачевД.Ю., Лукшин В.А., Яковлев С.Б. и др. Рекомендательный протокол: хирургическое лечение стенозирующих поражений магистральных артерий головного мозга. Nsicu.ru [Internet]. 2009 [цитировано 8 мая 2021]. Доступно: http://nsicu.ru/uploads/attachment/file/100/Recommendations-Stenosy.pdf [Usachev D, Lukshin V, Yakovlev et al. Recommended protocol: surgical treatment of stenosing lesions of the main cerebral arteries. Nsicu.ru [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2021 May 8]. Available from: http://nsicu.ru/uploads/attachment/file/100/Recommendations-Stenosy.pdf (In Russ)]
  10. Струк Ю.В., Якушева О.А., Сарычев П.В., Мищерин В.А. Оценка изменений гемодинамики при операциях стентирования внутренних сонных артерий. Международный Научный Институт «Educatio». 2015; 3 (10): 60–2. [Struk Yu.V., Yakusheva O.A., Sarychev P.V., Mishcherin V.A. Evaluation of hemodynamic findings during the operations of internal carotid artery stenting. International Scientific Institute “Educatio”. 2015; 3 (10): 60–2. (In Russ)]
  11. Mourikis D., Chatoupis K., Katsenis K., et al. Percutaneous injection of lidocaine within the carotid body area in carotid artery stenting: an ‘‘old-new’’ technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008; 31(4): 709–12. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-007-9239-7
  12. Cho C., Park H. Hemodynamic stability during carotid artery stenting under general anesthesia in elderly patients with a high grade carotid artery stenosis. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2010; 2(Suppl_1): A40–A40. DOI:1136/jnis.2010.003251.36
  13. Богданов Р.О., Шишкина Е.Н. Синокаротидная новокаиновая блокада как метод профилактики интраоперационных осложнений при ангиопластике и стентировании сонных артерий. Перспективные направления и новые технологии в здравоохранении. Материалы VII Республиканской научно-практической конференции. Йошкар-Ола, 2012. [Bogdanov R.O., Shishkina E.N. Sinocarotid novocaine blockade as a method of preventing intraoperative complications in angioplasty and stenting of the carotid arteries. Promising directions and new technologies in healthcare. Materials of the VII Republican Scientific and Practical Conference. Yoshkar-Ola, (In Russ)]
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 ANNALS OF CRITICAL CARE