ISSN (print) 1726-9806     ISSN (online) 1818-474X
No. 3 (2022), DIAGNOSTIC AND INTENSIVE CARE IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE
No. 3 (2022)
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTENSIVE CARE IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE

Effect of assisted lung ventilation on the level of serum biomarkers of lung injury after robot-assisted surgery: a prospective randomized study

Published 29.07.2022
A.A. Klimov
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-6852
A.A. Chotchaeva
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3173-0378
M.A. Pankratova
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1818-2933
Valerii V. Subbotin
Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia; Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0921-7199
#3 2022
PDF_2022-3_82-93 (Russian)
HTML_2022-3_82-93 (Russian)
PDF_2022-3_82-93
HTML_2022-3_82-93

Keywords

laparoscopy
robotic surgical procedures
lung
neuromuscular blockade
biomarkers
cytokines
inflammation mediators

How to Cite

1.
Klimov A.A., Chotchaeva A.A., Pankratova M.A., Subbotin V.V. Effect of assisted lung ventilation on the level of serum biomarkers of lung injury after robot-assisted surgery: a prospective randomized study. Annals of Critical Care. 2022;(3):82-93. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2022-3-82-93
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Statistic

Abstract Views: 50
PDF_2022-3_82-93 (Russian) Downloads: 27
HTML_2022-3_82-93 (Russian) Downloads: 13
PDF_2022-3_82-93 Downloads: 11
HTML_2022-3_82-93 Downloads: 8
Statistic from 01.07.2024

Language

English Русский

Most reader

Social Networks

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. It is uncertain whether assisted lung ventilation versus pressure control–volume guaranteed ventilation reduces ventilation-induced pulmonary injury and inflammation during anaesthesia for robotic surgery. OBJECTIVES. To compare Pressure support ventilation Pro (PSVpro) with moderate neuromuscular block (NMB) with protective pressure control–volume guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) with intensive neuromuscular block during anaesthesia for robotics abdominal surgery respect to biomarkers levels of lung injury and inflammation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Design: randomized clinical trial. 35 patients scheduled for elective robotic radical prostatectomy under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups. Group 1 — moderate and shallow NMB (TOF 1–4, TOF ratio T4/T1 < 40 %) and pressure support ventilation — PSVpro (n = 19), Group 2 — intensive NMB (TOF 0, PTC < 2) and protective pressure control–volume guaranteed ventilation — PCV-VG (n = 16). The primary outcome was the changes in serum levels of inflammation biomarkers (Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Interleukin-6 (IL-8)) and lung injury biomarker (Surfactant Protein D (SP-D)) 1 hour after the end of surgery. RESULTS. The levels of serum IL-6, IL-8, TNF-a and SP-D, before and after surgery were 2.1 [1.125; 16.215], 30.9 [12.85; 50.7]; 10.6 [8.04; 14.75], 13 [8.585; 21.25]; 4 [4; 4.035], 4 [4; 4]; 66.2 [39.2; 91.1], 65.4 [57; 109.6] in the Group 1 and 2.20 [1.55; 5.33], 26.15 [18.175; 42.875]; 10.45 [8.6425; 16.35], 19.15 [9.77; 31.35]; 4 [4; 4.815], 4 [4; 4]; 60.65 [49.56; 106.73], 63.20 [56.5; 106.65] in the Group 2 respectively. Changes in serum biomarkers levels were not significantly different between the two ventilation strategies. CONCLUSIONS. Pressure support ventilation Pro with moderate neuromuscular block compare to protective mandatory lung ventilation with intense neuromuscular block does not affect changes in serum levels of biomarkers for inflammation and lung injury IL-6, IL-8, SP-D and TNF-α in patients undergoing elective robotic prostatectomy.

PDF_2022-3_82-93 (Russian)
HTML_2022-3_82-93 (Russian)
PDF_2022-3_82-93
HTML_2022-3_82-93

References

  1. Дон Е.С., Тарасов А.В., Эпштейн О.И., Тарасов С.А. Биомаркеры в медицине: поиск, выбор, изучение и валидация. Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 2017; 62(1): 52–9. DOI: 10.18821/0869-2084-2017-62-1-52-59 [Don E.S., Tarasov A.V., Epshtein O.I., Tarasov S.A. The biomarkers in medicine: search, choice, study and validation. Klinicheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika (Russian Clinical Laboratory diagnoistics). 2017; 62(1): 52–9. DOI: 10.18821/0869-2084-2017-62-1-52-59 (In Russ)]
  2. Мороз В.В., Голубев А.М., Кузовлев А.Н., Писарев В.М. Новые диагностические кандидатные молекулярные биомаркеры острого респираторного дистресс-синдрома. Общая реаниматология. 2014; 10(4): 6–10. DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2014-4-6-10 [Moroz V.V., Golubev A.M., Kuzovlev A.N., Pisarev V.M. New Diagnostic Candidate Molecular Biomarkers of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. General Reanimatology. 2014; 10(4): 6–10. DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2014-4-6-10 (In Russ)]
  3. Blondonnet R., Constantin J.M., Sapin V., Jabaudon M. A Pathophysiologic Approach to Biomarkers in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Dis Markers. 2016; 2016: 3501373. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3501373
  4. D’Journo X.B., Michelet P., Marin V., et al. An early inflammatory response to oesophagectomy predicts the occurrence of pulmonary complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37(5): 1144–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.033
  5. Wen X.H., Kong H.Y., Zhu S.M., et al. Plasma levels of tumor necrotic factor-alpha and interleukin-6, -8 during orthotopic liver transplantation and their relations to postoperative pulmonary complications. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2004; 3(1): 38–41.
  6. de la Gala F., Piñeiro P., Garutti I., et al. Systemic and alveolar inflammatory response in the dependent and nondependent lung in patients undergoing lung resection surgery: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015; 32(12): 872–80. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000233
  7. Wrigge H., Uhlig U., Baumgarten G., et al. Mechanical ventilation strategies and inflammatory responses to cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31(10): 1379–87. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2767-1
  8. Serpa Neto A., Campos P.P., Hemmes S.N., et al. Kinetics of plasma biomarkers of inflammation and lung injury in surgical patients with or without postoperative pulmonary complications. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017; 34(4): 229–38. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000614
  9. Kim J.E., Min S.K., Ha E., et al. Effects of deep neuromuscular block with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on respiratory mechanics and biotrauma in a steep Trendelenburg position. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 1935. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81582-0
  10. Choi G., Wolthuis E.K., Bresser P., et al. Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure prevents alveolar coagulation in patients without lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(4): 689–95. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00013
  11. Engels G.E., Gu Y.J., van Oeveren W., et al. The utility of lung epithelium specific biomarkers in cardiac surgery: a comparison of biomarker profiles in on- and off-pump coronary bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 8: 4. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-4
  12. Park J., Pabon M., Choi A.M.K., et al. Plasma surfactant protein-D as a diagnostic biomarker for acute respiratory distress syndrome: validation in US and Korean cohorts. BMC Pulm Med. 2017; 17(1): 204. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-017-0532-1
  13. Dahmer M.K., Flori H., Sapru A., et al. Surfactant Protein D Is Associated With Severe Pediatric ARDS, Prolonged Ventilation, and Death in Children With Acute Respiratory Failure. Chest. 2020; 158(3): 1027–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.041
  14. Пугач В.А., Тюнин М.А., Власов Т.Д. и др. Биомаркеры острого респираторного дистресс-синдрома: проблемы и перспективы их применения. Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2019; 16(4): 38–46. DOI: 21292/2078-5658-2019-16-4-38-46 [Pugach V.A., Tyunin M.A., Vlasov T.D., et al. Biomarkers of acute respiratory distress syndrome: problems and prospects of their application. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2019; 16(4): 38–46. DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2019-16-4-38-46 (In Russ)]
  15. Мороз В.В., Лихванцев В.В., Федоров С.А. и др. Общая анестезия с сохраненным спонтанным дыханием через интубационную трубку. Общая реаниматология. 2010; 6(4): 43. DOI: 15360/1813-9779-2010-4-43 [Moroz V.V., Likhvantsev V.V., Fedorov S.A., et al. General Anesthesia with Preserved Spontaneous Breathing through an Intubation Tube. General Reanimatology. 2010; 6(4): 43. DOI: 10.15360/1813-9779-2010-4-43 (In Russ)]
  16. Mulier J., Sels A., Dillemans B., et al. Use of pressure support ventilation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery is possible and facilitates weaning and extubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008; 25: 78. DOI: 1097/00003643-200805001-00248
  17. Othenin-Girard A., Grandjean C., Monnard E., et al. Postoperative atelectasis prevention by application of PEEP and pressure support ventilation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014; 31: 79. DOI: 10.1097/00003643-201406001-00216
  18. Loeckinger A., Hoermann C., Keller C., et al. Augmented spontaneous breathing and pulmonary gas exchange during pneumoperitoneum. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002; 19(6): 424–7. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021502000674
  19. Букарев А.Е., Субботин В.В., Ильин С.А. и др. Вспомогательная вентиляция легких в комплексе анестезиологического обеспечения высокотравматичных оперативных вмешательств в сосудистой хирургии. Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2016; 61 (5): 380–5. DOI:18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-380-385 [Bukarev A.E., Subbotin V.V., Ilyin S.A., et al. Auxiliary ventilation of the lungs in the complex of anesthetic management of highly traumatic surgical interventions in vascular surgery. Anesthesiologiya i reanimatologiya. (Russian journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology) 2016; 61 (5): 380–5. DOI: 10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-380-385 (In Russ)]
  20. Weingarten T.N., Whalen F.X., Warner D.O., et al. Comparison of two ventilatory strategies in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 104(1): 16–22. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep319
  21. van der Woude M.C., Bormans L., van der Horst R.P., et al. Pulmonary levels of biomarkers for inflammation and lung injury in protective versus conventional one-lung ventilation for oesophagectomy: A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020; 37(11): 1040–9. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001126
  22. Kokulu S., Günay E., Baki E.D., et al. Impact of a lung-protective ventilatory strategy on systemic and pulmonary inflammatory responses during laparoscopic surgery: is it really helpful? Inflammation. 2015; 38(1): 361–7. DOI: 10.1007/s10753-014-0039-3
  23. Determann R.M., Wolthuis E.K., Choi G., et al. Lung epithelial injury markers are not influenced by use of lower tidal volumes during elective surgery in patients without preexisting lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008; 294(2): L344–L350. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00268.2007
  24. Wrigge H., Zinserling J., Stüber F., et al. Effects of mechanical ventilation on release of cytokines into systemic circulation in patients with normal pulmonary function. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93(6): 1413–7. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200012000-00012
  25. Wrigge H., Uhlig U., Zinserling J., et al. The effects of different ventilatory settings on pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses during major surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98(3): 775–81. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000100663.11852.bf
  26. Engels G.E., Gu Y.J., van Oeveren W., et al. The utility of lung epithelium specific biomarkers in cardiac surgery: a comparison of biomarker profiles in on- and off-pump coronary bypass surgery. JCardiothorac Surg. 2013; 8: DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-4
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 ANNALS OF CRITICAL CARE