Full-text of the article is available for this locale: Russian.
Keywords
сonscious sedation
deep sedation
hypnotics and sedatives
Delphi method
anesthesiology
deep sedation
hypnotics and sedatives
Delphi method
anesthesiology
How to Cite
1.
Lakhin R.E., Andreenko A.A., Vlasenko A.V., Martynov D.V., Lazarev V.V., Ovezov A.M., Gorbachev V.I., Leiderman I.N., Belkin A.A., Fisher V.V., Lomivorotov V.V., Kuzkov V.V., Shifman E.M., Grigoryev E.V., Popov A.S., Magomedov M.A., Yaroshetskiy A.I. Modified Delphi analysis of the clinical guideline “Sedation of patients in the departments of anesthesiology, intensive care and intensive care.” Annals of Critical Care. 2023;(2):45-54. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2023-2-45-54
Statistic
Abstract Views: 439
PDF_2023-2_45-54 (Russian) Downloads: 126
PDF_2023-2_45-54 (Russian) Downloads: 126
Statistic from 01.07.2024
Language
Most reader
-
2152
-
1056
-
913
-
671
-
647
Social Networks
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Approaches to sedation in the departments of anesthesiology, intensive care and intensive care have changed over the past 20 years. In 2020, the guidelines “Sedation of patients in the departments of anesthesiology, intensive care and intensive care” were placed in the rubric of clinical recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To contribute to improving the quality of planned updating of recommendations with the help of a modified Delphi analysis of the provisions and quality criteria of the current version of the document published in the rubricator of clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a modified Delphi method with two rounds of questionnaires to develop a consensus. The agreement of specialists was reached in three stages: preparatory, discussions and the development of a consensus conclusion. To conduct the assessment, a questionnaire was created consisting of 3 blocks: assessment of the provisions of the clinical recommendation; assessment of the quality criteria of the clinical recommendation and an overall assessment of the clinical recommendation. The assessment was made on the basis of the Likert scale. Median, fashion and weighted average score were calculated. If, when evaluating the provisions and quality criteria of a clinical recommendation, the median value or mode of any provision was less than 7, the weighted average score was less than 70 %; the median value or mode of quality criteria is less than 7.5, the weighted average score is less than 75 %, then this provision (quality criterion) should be recommended for processing. RESULTS: The assessment of the provisions and criteria was carried out in the first round of discussion. At the second round of discussion, comments and recommendations were finally developed for the developers of the methodological recommendation. Consensus was reached during two rounds of modified Delphi analysis. As a result of the analysis, 16 out of 21 provisions and 5 out of 6 quality criteria were agreed, the rest required processing. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of an independent assessment by experts, 5 provisions and 1 quality criterion were recommended for processing. Comments and recommendations on all these provisions and quality criteria of the methodological recommendation “Sedation of patients in the departments of anesthesiology, intensive care and intensive care” were also agreed.
References
- Stollings J.L., Balas M.C., Chanques G. Evolution of sedation management in the intensive care unit (ICU). Intensive Care Med. 2022; 48(11):1625–8. DOI: 10.1007/S00134-022-06806-X
- Kotfis K., van Diem-Zaal I., Roberson S.W., et al. The future of intensive care: delirium should no longer be an issue. Crit Care. 2022; 26(1). DOI: 10.1186/S13054-022-04077-Y
- Ostermann M.E., Keenan S.P., Seiferling R.A., Sibbald W.J. Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2000; 283(11): 1451–9. DOI: 10.1001/JAMA.283.11.1451
- Shapiro B.A., Warren J., Egol A.B., et al. Practice parameters for intravenous analgesia and sedation for adult patients in the intensive care unit: an executive summary. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23(9): 1596–600. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00021
- Shehabi Y., Bellomo R., Reade M.C., et al. Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 186(8): 724–31. DOI: 10.1164/RCCM.201203-0522OC
- Needham D.M., Davidson J., Cohen H., et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40(2): 502–9. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318232DA75
- Baron R., Binder A., Biniek R., et al. Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) — short version. Ger Med Sci. 2015; 13: 2–42. DOI: 10.3205/000223
- Celis-Rodríguez E., Díaz Cortés J.C., Cárdenas Bolívar Y.R., et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of sedoanalgesia and delirium in critically ill adult patients. Med intensiva. 2020; 44(3): 171–84. DOI: 10.1016/J.MEDIN.2019.07.013
- Devlin J.W., Skrobik Y., Gélinas C., et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46(9): E825–E873. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299
- Smith H.A.B., Besunder J.B., Betters K.A., et al. 2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022; 23(2): E74–E110. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002873
- Гридчик И.Е., Грицан А.И., Еременко А.А. и др. Седация пациентов в отделениях анестезиологии, реанимации и интенсивной терапии. Методические рекомендации. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://apicr.minzdrav.gov.ru/Files/recomend/МР111.PDF (Дата обращения 20.01.2023). [Gridchik I.E., Gritsan A.I., Eremenko A.A., et al. Sedation of patients in the departments of anesthesiology, intensive care and intensive care. Methodological recommendations. [Internet]. URL: https://apicr.minzdrav.gov.ru/Files/recomend/МР111.PDF (Accessed 20.01.2023).]
- Регламент подготовки и утверждения клинических (методических) рекомендаций Общероссийской общественной организации «Федерация анестезиологов и реаниматологов» (утвержден Президиумом ФАР 26 мая 2021 года). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://faronline.ru/s/reglament-podgotovki-i-utverzhdeniya-klinicheskikh-rekomendatsiy (Дата обращения 20.01.2023). [Regulations for the preparation and approval of clinical (methodological) recommendations of the All-Russian Public Organization “Federation of Anesthesiologists and Resuscitators” (approved by the Presidium of the FAR on May 26, 2021). [Internet]. Available from: https://faronline.ru/s/reglament-podgotovki-i-utverzhdeniya-klinicheskikh-rekomendatsiy (Accessed 20.01.2023).]
- Diamond I.R., Grant R.C., Feldman B.M., et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67(4): 401–9. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2013.12.002
- Заболотских И.Б., Григорьев С.В., Белкин А.А., Лахин. Р.Е. Технологии консенсуса при анализе рекомендаций: международный опыт применения метода Дельфи в анестезиологии и интенсивной терапии. Систематический обзор. Вестник интенсивной терапии им. А.И. Салтанова. 2021;(1): 90–106. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-1-90-106 [Zabolotskikh I.B., Grigoryev S.V., Belkin A.A., Lakhin R.E. Consensus technologies in the analysis of guidelines: international experience of application of Delphi method in anesthesiology and intensive care. Systematic review. Annals of critical care. 2021;(1): 90–106. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-1-90-106 (In Russ)]
- Soliman A.B.E., Pawluk S.A., Wilby K.J., Rachid O. The use of a modified Delphi technique to develop a critical appraisal tool for clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Int J Clin Pharm. 2022; 44(4): 894–903. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01390-y
- Blondonnet R., Quinson A., Lambert C., et al. Use of volatile agents for sedation in the intensive care unit: A national survey in France. PLoS One. 2021; 16(4). DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0249889
- Bugedo G., Santis C. Intracranial hypertension and deep sedation. Crit Care. 2019; 23(1). DOI: 10.1186/S13054-019-2578-3
- Carney N., Totten A.M., O’Reilly C., et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017; 80(1): 6–15. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432
- Picetti E., Catena F., Abu-Zidan F., et al. Early management of isolated severe traumatic brain injury patients in a hospital without neurosurgical capabilities: a consensus and clinical recommendations of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). World J Emerg Surg. 2023; 18(1): 5. DOI: 10.1186/S13017-022-00468-2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Annals of Critical Care