ISSN (print) 1726-9806     ISSN (online) 1818-474X
No. 2 (2023), SEDATION IN ANESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE UNITS
No. 2 (2023)
SEDATION IN ANESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE UNITS

Procedural sedation and/or analgesia: a review

Published 28.04.2023
R.E. Leshchenko
Novaya Bol'nica, Yekaterinburg, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-5132
A.L. Levit
Sverdlovskya Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1., Yekaterinburg, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9112-1259
Nadezhda S. Davydova
Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7842-6296
#2023-2
PDF_2023-2_117-129 (Russian)

Keywords

гипнотики и седативные препараты
deep sedation
hypnotics and sedatives

How to Cite

1.
Leshchenko R.E., Levit A.L., Davydova N.S. Procedural sedation and/or analgesia: a review. Annals of Critical Care. 2023;(2):117-129. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2023-2-117-129
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Statistic

Abstract Views: 679
PDF_2023-2_117-129 (Russian) Downloads: 276
Statistic from 01.07.2024

Language

English Русский

Most reader

Social Networks

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades procedural sedation and/or analgesia (PS/PSA) have been widely used for diagnostic examinations and minimally invasive surgical interventions outside of the operating room. The recommendations for (PS/PSA) presented in the literature contain contradictory data related to indications, contraindications, baseline monitoring level, priority level and sedation protocols. OBJECTIVE: To perform an analysis of current practice guidelines, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), literature review and to systematize data on the potential use of sedatives and narcotic analgesics in procedural sedation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and eLibrary were searched for PS/PSA guidelines, RCTs, and articles. RESULTS: The literature review describes the levels of sedation in increase in difficulty and potential risk of complications. A comparative characteristic of first- and second-line drugs for sedation and anesthesia is presented. Minimum requirements for perioperative monitoring of vital signs, sedation and pain levels are formulated. CONCLUSIONS: The PS/PSA in a planned or emergency procedure provides safe, comfortable and successful performance of diagnostic examinations and mini-invasive surgical interventions. The principles of interaction and administration of sedatives with narcotic analgesics are the basis for the use of sedation regimens. The use of scales has important practical value for monitoring the dynamics of sedation levels and for more fine management of sedation doses. There are no absolute contraindications for PS/PSA. PS/PSA is a popular area of practice for the anesthesiologist and resuscitator today. The Russian Federation's lack of regulatory documents on PS/PSA makes it necessary to develop guidelines.

PDF_2023-2_117-129 (Russian)

Full-text of the article is available for this locale: Russian.

References

  1. Green S.M., Roback M.G., Krauss B.S., et al. Unscheduled Procedural Sedation: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Practice Guideline. Ann Emerg Med. 2019; 73(5): e51–e65. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.02.022
  2. Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology Anesthesiology. 2018; 128(3): 437–79. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002043
  3. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Early D.S., Lightdale J.R., et al. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87(2): 327–37. DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.018
  4. Dossa F., Dubé C., Tinmouth J., et al. Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020; 7(1): e000348. DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000348
  5. Tobias J.D., Leder M. Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011; 5(4): 395–410. DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.87270
  6. Shuang Yin., Junpeng H., Tong S., et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of Sufentanil, Dexmedetomidine, or Ketamine Added to Propofol-based Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Elderly Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Randomized Controlled Trial Clin Ther. 2019; 41(9): 1864–77.e0. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.06.011
  7. Seshadri R., Sadasivan SI., Sudhindra D., et al. BIS Targeted Propofol Sparing Effects of Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine in Outpatient ERCP: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(5): UC07-12. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12435.5991
  8. Stronati G., Capucci A., Russo A., et al. Procedural sedation for direct current cardioversion: a feasibility study between two management strategies in the emergency department. Randomized Controlled Trial BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020; 20(1): 388. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01664-1
  9. Cevik Е., Bilgic S., Kilic E., et al. Comparison of ketamine-low-dose midozolam with midazolam-fentanyl for orthopedic emergencies: a double-blind randomized trial. Randomized Controlled Trial Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 31(1): 108–13. DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.012
  10. Prys-Roberts C. Anaesthesia: a practical or impractical construct? Br J Anaesth 1987; 59(11): 1341–5. DOI: 10.1093/bja/59.11.1341
  11. Bouillon T.W., Bruhn J., Radulescu L., et al. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(6): 1353–72. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00006
  12. Fung B.M., Leon D.J., Beck L.N., et al. Pre-procedural Preparation and Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2022; 67(7): 2739–53. DOI:10.1007/s10620-021-07111-1
  13. Igea F., Casellas J.A., González-Huix F., et al. Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clinical practice guidelines of the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva. Guideline. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2014; 106(3): 195–211.
  14. Cascella M. Anesthesia awareness. Can midazolam attenuate or prevent memory consolidation on intraoperative awakening during general anesthesia without increasing the risk of postoperative delirium? Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015; 68(2): 200–2. DOI:10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.200
  15. Uri О., Behrbalk E., Haim A., et al. Procedural sedation with propofol for painful orthopaedic manipulation in the emergency department expedites patient management compared with a midazolam/ketamine regimen: a randomized prospective study. Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(24): 2255–62. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01307
  16. Miner J.R., Danahy M., Moch A., et al. Randomized clinical trial of etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 49(1): 15–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.042
  17. Miner J.R., Gray R., Bahr J., et al. Randomized clinical trial of propofol versus ketamine for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17(6): 604–11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00776
  18. Homfray G., Palmer A., Grimsmo-Powney H., et al. Procedural sedation of elderly patients by emergency physicians: a safety analysis of 740 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121(6): 1236–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.038
  19. Guacho J.A., Hourneaux de Moura D.T., Ribeiro I.B., et al. Propofol vs midazolam sedation for elective endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 12(8): 241–55. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i8.241
  20. Wahab E.A., Hamed E.F., Ahmad H.S., et al. Conscious sedation using propofol versus midazolam in cirrhotic patients during upper GI endoscopy: A comparative study. JGH Open. 2018; 3(1): 25–31. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12098
  21. Khalil M., Al-Agaty A., Asaad O., et al. A comparative study between propofol and dexmedetomidine as sedative agents during performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Clin Anesth. 2016; 32: 242–7. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.014
  22. Benzoni T., Cascella M. Procedural Sedation. [Updated 2022 Oct 16]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551685/. Accessed 2022, Nov 10.
  23. Куклин В.Н. Анестезия в отделении хирургии одного дня. Обзор литературы. Вестник интенсивной терапии им. А.И. Салтанова. 2020; 4: 88–98. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-88-98 [Kuklin V.N. Anaesthesia for day case surgery. Review. Annals of Critical Care. 2020; 4: 88–98. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-88-98. (In Russ)]
  24. Inatomi O., Imai T., Fujimoto T., et al. Dexmedetomidine is safe and reduces the additional dose of midazolam for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in very elderly patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018; 18(1): 166. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0897-5
  25. Kim N., Yoo Y., Lee SK., et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Randomized Controlled Trial World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(12): 3671–8. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671
  26. Nishizawa T., Suzuki H., Hosoe N., et al. Dexmedetomidine vs propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5: 1037–45. DOI: 10.1177/2050640616688140
  27. Царьков А.В., Левит А.Л. Дексмедетомидин и комбинация бензодиазепина с фентанилом при плановых эндоваскулярных стентированиях коронарных артерий. Сравнительный анализ. Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2022; 19(3): 33–40. DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2022-19-3-33-40 [Tsarkov A.V., Levit A.L. Dexmedetomidine and the Combination of Benzodiazepine and Fentanyl in Elective Endovacular Stenting of the Coronary Arteries. Comparative Analysis. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2022; 19(3): 33–40. DOI: 10.21292/2078-5658-2022-19-3-33-40 (In Russ)]
  28. Лещенко Р.Е., Давыдова Н.С. Эффективность и безопасность проведения септопластики у пациентов в условиях среднего уровня седации и анальгезии. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2019; 12(180): 34–40. DOI: 10.25694/URMJ.2019.12.10 [Leshchenko R.E., Davydova N.S. Efficacy and safety of septoplasty in patients under a moderate level of sedation and analgesia. Urals Medical Journal. 2019; 12(180): 34–40. DOI: 10.25694/URMJ.2019.12.10. (In Russ)]
  29. Gertler R., Brown H.C., Mitchell D.H., et al. Dexmedetomidine: a novel sedative-analgesic agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001; 14(1): 13–21. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2001.11927725
  30. Scheinin H., Aantaa R., Anttila M., et al. Reversal of the sedative and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine with a specific alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole: a pharmacodynamic and kinetic study in healthy volunteers. Clinical Trial Anesthesiology. 1998; 89(3): 574–84. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199809000-00005
  31. Kim K.M., Lee H.J., Kim S.Y., et al. Combined use of dexmedetomidine and propofol in monitored anesthesia care: a randomized controlled study. Randomized Controlled Tr. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017; 17(1): 34. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0311-9
  32. Peltoniemi M.A., Hagelberg N.M., Olkkola K.T., et al. Ketamine: A Review of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Anesthesia and Pain Therapy. Review Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016; 55(9): 1059–77. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-016-0383-6
  33. Шиндяпина Н.В., Маршалов Д.В., Шифман Е.М., Кулигин А.В. Клинические эффекты внутривенного введения низких доз кетамина в акушерстве: систематический обзор. Вестник интенсивной терапии им. А.И. Салтанова. 2020; 2: 104–21. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-2-104-121 [Shindyapina N.V., Marshalov D.V., Shifman E.M., et al. Clinical effects of low-dose intravenous ketamine in obstetrics: a systematic review. Annals of Critical Care. 2020; 2: 104–21. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-2-104-121. (In Russ)]
  34. Varadarajulu S., Eloubeidi M.A., Tamhane A., et al. Prospective randomized trial evaluating ketamine for advanced endoscopic procedures in difficult to sedate patients. Randomized Controlled Trial Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25(8): 987–97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03285.x
  35. Tuncali B., Pekcan Y.O., Celebi A., et al. Addition of low-dose ketamine to midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Randomized Controlled Trial J Clin Anesth. 2015; 27(4): 301–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.017
  36. Shah A., Mosdossy G., McLeod S., et al. A blinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate ketamine/propofol versus ketamine alone for procedural sedation in children. Randomized Controlled Trial Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57(5): 425–33.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.032
  37. Ghojazadeh M., Sanaie S., Paknezhad S.P., et al. Using Ketamine and Propofol for Procedural Sedation of Adults in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Review Adv Pharm Bull. 2019; 9(1): 5–11. DOI: 10.15171/apb.2019.002
  38. Eberson C.P., Hsu R.Y., Borenstein T.R., et al. Procedural sedation in the emergency department. Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23(4): 233–42. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00236
  39. Qiudi Z., Jun Z., Qian H., et al. Dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam infusion guided by bispectral index during bronchoscopy. Clin Respir J. 2021; 15(9): 929–36. DOI: 10.1111/crj.13383
  40. Yu C., Li S., Deng F., et al. Comparison of dexmedetomidine/fentanyl with midazolam/fentanyl combination for sedation and analgesia during tooth extraction. Randomized Controlled Trial Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43(9): 1148–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.019
  41. Baudet J.S., Aguirre-Jaime A. Effect of conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl on the overall quality of colonoscopy: a prospective and randomized study. Randomized Controlled Trial Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019; 111(7): 507–13. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5735/2018
  42. Aminiahidashti H., Shafiee S., Hosseininejad S.M., et al. Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients with trauma. Randomized Controlled Trial Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 36(10): 1766–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.080
  43. Заболотских И.Б., Анисимов М.А., Горобец Е.С. и др. Периоперационное ведение пациентов с сопутствующим морбидным ожирением. Методические рекомендации Общероссийской общественной организации «Федерация анестезиологов и реаниматологов». Вестник интенсивной терапии им. А.И. Салтанова. 2021; 1: 7–18. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-1-7-18 [Zabolotskikh I.B., Anisimov M.A., Gorobets E.S., et al. Perioperative management of patients with concomitant morbid obesity. Guidelines of the All-Russian public organization “Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists”. Annals of Critical Care. 2021; 1: 7–18. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-1-7-18. (In Russ)]
  44. Sener S., Eken C., Schultz C.H., et al. Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Randomized Controlled Trial Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57(2): 109–14.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.09.010
  45. Kennedy R.M., Porter F.L., Miller J.P., et al. Comparison of fentanyl/midazolam with ketamine/midazolam for pediatric orthopedic emergencies. Clinical Trial Pediatrics. 1998; 102(4Pt1): 956–63. DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.4.956
  46. Singh R., Batra Y.K., Bharti N., et al. Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anesthesia in children: randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Randomized Controlled Trial Paediatr Anaesth. 2010; 20(5): 439–44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03286.x
  47. Hinkelbein J., Lamperti M., Akeson J., et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018; 35(1): 6–24. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000683
  48. No authors listed. Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergo-ing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126(3): 376–93. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452
  49. Godwin S.A., Burton J.H., Gerardo C.J., et al. Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department [published correction appears in Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov; 70(5): 758]. Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 63(2): 247–58.e18. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.015
  50. Beach M.L., Cohen D.M., Gallagher S.M., et al. Major Adverse Events and Relationship to Nil per Os Status in Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia Outside the Operating Room: A Report of the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesthesiology. 2016; 124(1): 80–8. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000933
  51. Neelakanta G., Chikyarappa A. A review of patients with pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during anesthesia reported to the Departmental Quality Assurance Committee. J Clin Anesth. 2006; 18(2): 102–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.07.002
  52. Green S.M., Roback M.G., Kennedy R.M., et al. Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update. Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57(5): 449–61. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.11.030
  53. Coté C.J., Wilson S., et al. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: update 2016. Pediatrics. 2016; 138(1): e20161212. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1212
  54. Green S.M., Mason K.P., Krauss B.S. Pulmonary aspiration during procedural sedation: a comprehensive systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2017; 118(3): 344–54. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex004
  55. Williams M.R., McKeown A., Dexter F., et al. Efficacy Outcome Measures for Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials in Adults: An ACTTION Systematic Review. Anesth Analg. 2016; 122(1): 152–70. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000934
  56. Chernik D.A., Gillings D., Laine H., et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990; 10(4): 244–51.
  57. Paspatis G.A., Chainaki I., Manolaraki M.M., et al. Efficacy of bispectral index monitoring as an adjunct to propofol deep sedation for ERCP: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(12): 1046–51. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215342
  58. Wilson E., David A., MacKenzie A. Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth. 1990; 64(1): 48–52. DOI: 10.1093/bja/64.1.48
  59. Namigar T., Serap K., Esra A.T., et al. Correlação entre a escala de sedação de Ramsay, escala de sedação‐agitação de Richmond e escala de sedação‐agitação de Riker durante sedação com midazolam‐remifentanil [The correlation among the Ramsay sedation scale, Richmond agitation sedation scale and Riker sedation agitation scale during midazolam-remifentanil sedation]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017; 67(4): 347–54. DOI:10.1016/j.bjan.2017.03.006
  60. Salmore R. Development of a new pain scale: Colorado Behavioral Numerical Pain Scale for sedated adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2002; 25(6): 257–62. DOI: 10.1097/00001610-200211000-00007
  61. Munson G.W., Van Norstrand M.D., O’Donnell J.J., et al. Intraprocedural evaluation of comfort for sedated outpatient upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: the La Crosse (WI) intra-endoscopy sedation comfort score. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011; 34(4): 296–301. DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3182248777
  62. Rostom A., Ross E.D., Dubé C., et al. Development and validation of a nurse assessed patient comfort score for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77(2): 255–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.003
  63. Wu Y., Zhang Y., Hu X., et al. A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation. Randomized Controlled Trial J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015; 40(4): 419–25. DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12282.
  64. Ren C., Xu G., Liu Y., et al. Effect of Conscious Sedation vs. General Anesthesia on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 170. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00170. eCollection 2020
  65. Wynands J.E., Wong P., Townsend G.E., et al. Narcotic requirements for intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1984; 63: 101–5.
  66. Koers L., Eber S., Cappon A., et al. Safety of moderate-to-deep sedation performed by sedation practitioners: A national prospective observational study. Observational Study Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018; 35(9): 659–66. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000835
  67. Brouwer T.F., Yilmaz D., Lindeboom R., et al. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy. Randomized Controlled Trial J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(19): 2047–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.044
  68. Joshi V.S., Kollu S.S., Sharma R.M., et al. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and ketamine versus propofol and ketamine for procedural sedation in children undergoing minor cardiac procedures in cardiac catheterization laboratory. Randomized Controlled Trial Ann Card Anaesth. 2017; 20(4): 422–6. DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_16_17
  69. Матинян Н.В., Белоусова Е.И., Иванова Т.Е. и др. Каудально-эпидуральная блокада как компонент ранней реабилитации в детской онкохирургии. Вестник интенсивной терапии им. А.И. Салтанова. 2020; 2: 129–36. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-2-129-136 [Matinyan N.V., Belousova E.I., Ivanova T.E., et al. Role of Caudal Epidural Block in enhanced recovery after pediatric oncologic surgery. Article. Annals of Critical Care. 2021; 2: 129–36. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-2-129-136. (In Russ)]
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Annals of Critical Care

Most read articles by the same author(s)