ISSN (print) 1726-9806     ISSN (online) 1818-474X
No. 4 (2020), EDITORIAL
No. 4 (2020)
EDITORIAL

Consensus technologies in the analysis of guidelines

Published 16.11.2020
Igor B. Zabolotskikh
Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-2546
S.V. Grigoryev
Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-7351
A.A. Belkin
Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-1492
R.E. Lakhin
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-9691
#2020-4
PDF_2020-04_8-11 (Russian)
HTML_2020-04_8-11 (Russian)

Keywords

document expertise
AGREE II
Delphi method
nominal group technique
RAND appropriateness method
NIH consensus conference

How to Cite

1.
Zabolotskikh I.B., Grigoryev S.V., Belkin A.A., Lakhin R.E. Consensus technologies in the analysis of guidelines. Annals of Critical Care. 2020;(4):8-11. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-8-11
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Statistic

Abstract Views: 366
PDF_2020-04_8-11 (Russian) Downloads: 31
HTML_2020-04_8-11 (Russian) Downloads: 497
Statistic from 01.07.2024

Language

English Русский

Most reader

Social Networks

Abstract

Consensus technologies in the analysis of guidelines
PDF_2020-04_8-11 (Russian)
HTML_2020-04_8-11 (Russian)

References

  1. Brouwers M.C., Kho M.E., Browman G.P., et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010; 182(18): E839–42.
  2. Brouwers M.C., Kho M.E., Browman G.P., et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ. 2010; 182(10): 1045–1052.
  3. Brouwers M.C., Kho M.E., Browman G.P., et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010; 182(10): E472–8.
  4. Girardis M., Cantaroni C., Savoia G., et al. A critical appraisal of the quality of analgosedation guidelines in critically ill patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016; 82(2): 230–235.
  5. Hoydonckx Y., Kumar P., Flamer D., et al. Quality of chronic pain interventional treatment guidelines from pain societies: Assessment with the AGREE II instrument. Eur J Pain. 2020; 24(4): 704–721. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1524
  6. Sekercioglu N., Al-Khalifah R., Ewusie J.E., et al. A critical appraisal of chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorders clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017; 49(2): 273–284. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1436-3
  7. Akyol M.U., Alden T.D., Amartino H., et al. Recommendations for the management of MPS IVA: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019; 14(1): 137. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1074-9
  8. Akyol M.U., Alden T.D., Amartino H., et al. Recommendations for the management of MPS VI: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019; 14(1): 118. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1080-y
  9. Rehn M., Chew M.S., Olkkola K.T., et al. Clinical practice guideline on atraumatic (pencil-point) vs conventional needles for lumbar puncture: Endorsement by the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019; 63(4): 438–439. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13312
  10. Dalkey N.C., Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science. 1963; 9: 458–467.
  11. Delbecq A., Van de Ven A. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1971; 7: 467–492.
  12. Fink A., Kosecoff J., Chassin M., Brook R.H. Consensus Methods: Characteristics and Guidelines for Use. AJPH. 1984; 74(9).
  13. McMillan S.S., King M., Tully M.P. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016; 38(3): 655–662. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x
  14. Diamond I.R. et al. Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014; 67: 401e409.
  15. Linstone H.A., Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
  16. Haller G., Bampoe S., Cook T., et al. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: clinical indicators // Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123(2): 228–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.041
  17. Sunde G.A., Kottmann A., Heltne J.K., et al. Standardised data reporting from pre-hospital advanced airway management — a nominal group technique update of the Utstein-style airway template. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018; 26(1): 46. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-018-0509-y
  18. Frankel H.L., Kirkpatrick A.W., Elbarbary M., et al. Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part I: General Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43(11): 2479–2502. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001216
  19. Singh Y., Tissot C., Fraga M.V., et al. International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9
  20. Valentine S.L., Bembea M.M., Muszynski J.A., et al. Consensus Recommendations for RBC Transfusion Practice in Critically Ill Children From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19(9): 884–898. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001613
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>