Технологии консенсуса при экспертизе рекомендаций
#2020-4
PDF_2020-04_8-11
HTML_2020-04_8-11

Ключевые слова

экспертиза документов
AGREE II
метод Дельфи
метод номинальных групп
смешанный метод соответствия RAND
собрание по выработке консенсуса

Как цитировать

Заболотских И.Б., Григорьев С.В., Белкин А.А., Лахин Р.Е. Технологии консенсуса при экспертизе рекомендаций. Вестник интенсивной терапии имени А.И. Салтанова. 2020;(4):8–11. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-8-11.

Статистика

Просмотров аннотации: 63
PDF_2020-04_8-11 загрузок: 8
HTML_2020-04_8-11 загрузок: 6
Статистика с 21.01.2023

Аннотация

Технологии консенсуса при экспертизе рекомендаций
https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-8-11
PDF_2020-04_8-11
HTML_2020-04_8-11

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Brouwers M.C., Kho M.E., Browman G.P., et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010; 182(18): E839–42.
  2. Brouwers M.C., Kho M.E., Browman G.P., et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ. 2010; 182(10): 1045–1052.
  3. Brouwers M.C., Kho M.E., Browman G.P., et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010; 182(10): E472–8.
  4. Girardis M., Cantaroni C., Savoia G., et al. A critical appraisal of the quality of analgosedation guidelines in critically ill patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016; 82(2): 230–235.
  5. Hoydonckx Y., Kumar P., Flamer D., et al. Quality of chronic pain interventional treatment guidelines from pain societies: Assessment with the AGREE II instrument. Eur J Pain. 2020; 24(4): 704–721. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1524
  6. Sekercioglu N., Al-Khalifah R., Ewusie J.E., et al. A critical appraisal of chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorders clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017; 49(2): 273–284. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1436-3
  7. Akyol M.U., Alden T.D., Amartino H., et al. Recommendations for the management of MPS IVA: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019; 14(1): 137. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1074-9
  8. Akyol M.U., Alden T.D., Amartino H., et al. Recommendations for the management of MPS VI: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019; 14(1): 118. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1080-y
  9. Rehn M., Chew M.S., Olkkola K.T., et al. Clinical practice guideline on atraumatic (pencil-point) vs conventional needles for lumbar puncture: Endorsement by the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019; 63(4): 438–439. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13312
  10. Dalkey N.C., Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science. 1963; 9: 458–467.
  11. Delbecq A., Van de Ven A. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1971; 7: 467–492.
  12. Fink A., Kosecoff J., Chassin M., Brook R.H. Consensus Methods: Characteristics and Guidelines for Use. AJPH. 1984; 74(9).
  13. McMillan S.S., King M., Tully M.P. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016; 38(3): 655–662. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x
  14. Diamond I.R. et al. Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014; 67: 401e409.
  15. Linstone H.A., Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
  16. Haller G., Bampoe S., Cook T., et al. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: clinical indicators // Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123(2): 228–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.041
  17. Sunde G.A., Kottmann A., Heltne J.K., et al. Standardised data reporting from pre-hospital advanced airway management — a nominal group technique update of the Utstein-style airway template. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018; 26(1): 46. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-018-0509-y
  18. Frankel H.L., Kirkpatrick A.W., Elbarbary M., et al. Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part I: General Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43(11): 2479–2502. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001216
  19. Singh Y., Tissot C., Fraga M.V., et al. International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9
  20. Valentine S.L., Bembea M.M., Muszynski J.A., et al. Consensus Recommendations for RBC Transfusion Practice in Critically Ill Children From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19(9): 884–898. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001613
Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.