Внезапный отек мозга после неосложненной двухсторонней краниопластики. Клиническое наблюдение и обзор литературы
№ 2 (2020) , КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ НАБЛЮДЕНИЯ
№ 2 (2020)
КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ НАБЛЮДЕНИЯ

Внезапный отек мозга после неосложненной двухсторонней краниопластики. Клиническое наблюдение и обзор литературы

https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2020-2-137-145
Опубликован 02.06.2020
Андрей Юрьевич Лубнин
ФГАУ «НМИЦ нейрохирургии им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-5877
А.А. Потапов
ФГАУ «НМИЦ нейрохирургии им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8343-3511
И.В. Никитенкова
ФГАУ «НМИЦ нейрохирургии им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
И.А. Савин
ФГАУ «НМИЦ нейрохирургии им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-5441
К.А. Попугаев
ФГАУ «НМИЦ нейрохирургии им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-323X
А.В. Ошоров
ФГАУ «НМИЦ нейрохирургии им. акад. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3674-252X
#2020-2
PDF_2020-02_137-142
HTML_2020-02_137-145

Ключевые слова

краниопластика
осложнения
острый отек мозга

Как цитировать

Лубнин А.Ю., Потапов А.А., Никитенкова И.В., Савин И.А., Попугаев К.А., Ошоров А.В. Внезапный отек мозга после неосложненной двухсторонней краниопластики. Клиническое наблюдение и обзор литературы. Вестник интенсивной терапии имени А.И. Салтанова. 2020;(2):137–145. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2020-2-137-145.
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA ГОСТ

Скачать ссылку

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Статистика

Просмотров аннотации: 191
PDF_2020-02_137-142 загрузок: 12
HTML_2020-02_137-145 загрузок: 105
Статистика с 21.01.2023

Язык

English Русский

Объявления

Мы в соцсетях

Аннотация

В работе приведено описание клинического наблюдения острого развития отека мозга после неосложненной двухсторонней краниопластики. В обсуждении и обзоре литературы рассматриваются механизмы развития отека мозга, возникающего после закрытия обширных костных дефектов черепа, в особенности больших и двухсторонних, а также возможная роль субгалеальных дренажей.
https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2020-2-137-145
PDF_2020-02_137-142
HTML_2020-02_137-145

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Arac A., Blanchard V., Steinberg G.K. Assessment of outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in patients older than 60 years of age. Neurosurg. Focus. 2009; 26: E3. DOI: 10.3171/2009.3.FOCUS0958
  2. Bohman L.E., Schuster J.M. Decompressive craniectomy for management of traumatic brain injury: an update. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2013; 13: 392. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-013-0392-x
  3. Bor-Seng-Shu E., Figueiredo E.G., Amorium R.L., et al. Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain surgery. J. Neurosurg. 2012; 117: 589–596. DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.JNS101400
  4. Coutinho J.M. Cerebral venous thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2015: 13(Suppl. 1): S238–S244. DOI: 10.1111/jth.12945
  5. Merenda A., DeGeorgia M. Craniectomy for acute ischemic stroke: how to apply the data to the bedside. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2010; 23: 53–58. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328334bdf4
  6. Rahme R., Zuccarello M., Kleindorfer D., et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignat middle cerebral artery territory infarction: is life worth living? J. Neurosurg. 2012; 117: 749–754. DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.JNS111140
  7. Raza E., Shamim M.S., Wadiwala M.F., et al. Decompressive surgery for malignant cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: a retrospective case series from Pakistan and comparative literature review. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2014; 23: e13–e23. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.045
  8. Sahuquillo J., Martinez-Ricarte F., Poca M.A. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury after DECRA trial. Where do we stand? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2013; 19: 101–106. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3285eba1a
  9. Wijdicks E.F., Sheth K.N., Carter B.S., et al. AHA Stroke Council. Recommendations for management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; 45: 1222–1238. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6
  10. Hill C.S., Luoma A.M., Wilson S.R., Kitchen N. Titanium cranioplasty and prediction of complications. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2012; 26: 832–837. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.692839
  11. Klinger D.R., Madden C., Beshay J., et al. Autologous and acrylic cranioplasty: a review of 10 eyars and 258 cases. World Neurosurg. 2014; 82: e525–e530. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.08.005
  12. Schwarz F., Dunisch P., Walter J., et al. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: is there a rationale for an initial artificial bone-substitute implant? A single-center experience after 631 procedures. J. Neurosurg. 2015; 124: 1–6. DOI: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS159
  13. Durga P., Sahu B.P. Neurological deterioration during intubation in cervical spine disorders.Indian J.Anaesth. 2014; 58: 684–692. DOI: 10.4103/0019–5049.147132
  14. Harris E.A. Airway management for the patient with an unstable cervical spine. In: Ruskin K.J., Rosenbaum S.H., Rampil I.J. (Eds.). Fundamentals of Neuroanesthesia. 2014. Oxford Univ. Press. P. 288–303.
  15. Amoozegar F., Ronskley P.E., Sauve R., Menon B.K. Hormonal contraceptives and cerebral venous thrombosis risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 2015; 6, A7: 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00007
  16. Coutinho J.M., Majoie C.B., Coert B.A., Stam J. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in cerebral sinus thrombosis: consecutive case series and review of the literature. Stroke. 2009; 40: 2233–2235. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.543421
  17. Ferro J.M., Canhao P. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: update on diagnosis and management. Curr. Radiol Rep. 2014; 16: 523. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-014-0523-2
  18. Fischer C., Goldstein J., Edlow J. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in the emergency department: retrospective analysis of 17 cases and review of the literature. J. Emerg. Med. 2010; 38: 140–147. DOI: 10.1016./jemermed.2009.08.061
  19. Kenmur C.L., Jovin T., Jadhav A. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in users of a hormonal vaginal ring. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 126: 830–833. DOI: 10/1097/AOG.0000000000000931
  20. Siudut J., Swiat M., Undas A. Altered fibrin clot properties in patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: Association with the risk of recurrence. Stroke. 2015; 46: 2666–2668. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009528
  21. Agner C., Dujovny M., Gaviria M. Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir. 2002; 144: 1033–1040.
  22. Decaminada N., Pernter P., Imondi A., Tomassini A. CT perfusion evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics before and after cranioplasty. Neuroradiol. J. 2008; 21: 459–471. DOI: 10.1177/19714009080210042
  23. Erdogan E., Duz B., Kokaoglu M., Izci Y., Nimurkaynak E. The effect of cranioplasty on cerebral hemo-dynamics: evaluation with transcranial Doppler sonography. Neurol. India. 2003; 51: 479–481.
  24. Kemmling A., Duning T., Lemcke L., et al. Case report of MR perfusion imaging in sinking skin flap syndrome: growing evidence for hemodynamic impairment. BMC Neurol. 2010; 10: 80. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-80
  25. Jelcic N., Della Puppa A., Mottaran R., et al. Case series evidence for improvement of executive functions after late cranioplasty. Brain Inj. 2013; 27: 1723–1726. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2013.844857.
  26. Jeyaraj P. Importance of early cranioplasty in reversing the “Syndrome of the trephine/motor trephine syndrome/sinking skin flap syndrome”. J. Maxillofac. Oral. Surg. 2015; 14: 666–673. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0673-1
  27. Kuo J.R., Wang C.C., Chio C.C., Cheng T.J. Neurological improvement after cranio-plasty — analysis by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2004; 11: 486–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2003.06.005
  28. Song J., Liu M., Mo X., et al. Beneficial impact of early cranioplasty in patients with decompressive craniectomy: evidence from trenscranial Doppler ultrasonography. Acta Neurochir. 2014; 156: 193–198. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-013-1908-5
  29. Winkler P.A., Stummer W., Linke R., et al. The influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, carabrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism. Neurosurg. Focus. 2000; 8: e9. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2000.8.1.1920
  30. Sakamoto S., Eguchi K., Kiura Y., et al. CT perfusion imaging in the syndrome of the sinking flap before and after cranioplasty. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2006; 108: 583–585. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.03.012
  31. Annan M., De Toffol B., Hommet C., Mondon K. Sinking skin flap syndrome (or syndrome of the trephined): A review. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2015; 29: 314–318. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1012047
  32. Honeybul S. Neurological susceptibility to a skull defect. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2014; 5: 83. DOI: 10.4103/2152–7806.133886
  33. Honeybul S., Janzen C., Kruger K., Ho K.M. The incidence of neurological instability to a skull defect. World Neurosurg. 2015; pii: S1878–8750(15)01249–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.2neu.2015.09.081.
  34. Chan K.W., Datta N.N. Iatrogenic acute subdural hematoma due to drainage catheter. Surg. Neurol. 2000; 54: 444–446.
  35. Karamchandani K., Chouhan R.S., Bithal P.K., Dash H.H. Severe bradicardia and hypotension after connecting negative pressure to the subgaleal drain during craniotomy closure. Br. J. Anaesth. 2006; 96: 608–610. DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael063
  36. Mohindra S., Mukherjee K.K., Chhabra K.K., Khosla V.K. Subgaleal suction drain leading to fatal sagittal sinus hemorrhage. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2005; 19: 352–354. DOI: 10.1080/02688690500305308
  37. Prabhakar H., Bithal P.K., Chouhan R.S., Dash H.H. Rupture of intracranial aneurysm after partial clipping due to aspiration drainage system — a case report. Middle East J. Anaesthesiol. 2008; 19: 1185–1190.
  38. Roth J., Galeano E., Milla S., et al. Multiple epidural hematomas and hemodynamic collapse caused by a subgaleal drain and suction-induced intracranial hypotension: case report. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68: E271–E276. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fe6165
  39. Toshniwal G.R., Bhagat H., Rath G.P. Bradycardia following negative pressure suction of subgaleal drain during craniotomy closure. Acta Neurochir. 2007; 149: 1077–1079. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-007-1246-6
  40. Van Roost D., Thees C., Brenke C., et al. Pseudohypoxic brain swelling: a newly defined complication after uneventful brain surgery, probably related to suction drainage. Neurosurgery. 2003; 53: 1315–1326. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000093498.08913.9e
  41. Yadav M., Nikhar S.A., Kulkarni D.K., Gopinath R. Cardiac arrest after connecting negative pressure to the subgaleal drain during craniotomy closure. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2014; 2014: Article ID 146870. DOI: 10.1155/2014/146870
  42. Chitale R., Tjoumakaris S., Gonzalez F., et al. Infratentorial and supratentorial strokes after cranioplasty. Neurologist. 2013; 19: 17–21. DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31827c6bb6
  43. Honeybul S. Sudden death following cranioplasty: a complication of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2011; 25: 343–345. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.568643
  44. Lee G.S., Park S.Q., Kim R., Cho S.J. Unexpected severe cerebral edema after cranioplasty: Case report and literature review. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2015; 58: 76–78. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2015.58.1.76
  45. Santana-Cabrera L., Perez-Ortiz C., Rodriguez-Escort C., Sanchez-Palacios M. Massive postoperative swelling following cranioplasty. Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj. 2012; 2: 107–108. DOI: 10.4103/2229–5151.97277
  46. Zebian B., Critchley G. Sudden death following cranioplasty: a complication of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2011; 25: 785–786. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.623801
  47. Robles A., Cuevas-Solorzano A. Massive brain swelling and death after cranioplasty: A systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2018; 111: 98–108. DOI: 10.1016/wneu2017.12.061
  48. Spetzler R.F., Wilson C.D., Weinstein P., et al. Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough theory. Clin. Neurosurg. 1978; 25: 651–672.
  49. Petrozza P.H. Hyperemic complications following resection of arterio-venous malformation: New througts. J. NS Anesth. 1995; 7: 202.
  50. Dodson B.A. Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough syndrome: Entity or excuse? J. NS Anesth. 1995; 7: 203–207.
  51. Al-Rodhan N.R.F. Occlusive hyperemia remains the most logical explanation for the hemodynamic complications of resected intracerebral arteriovenous malformations. J. NS Anesth. 1995; 7: 208–210.
  52. Moulakakis K.G., Mylonas S.N., Styroeras G.S., Andrikopoulos V. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009; 49: 1060–1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.026
  53. Medel R., Crowley R.W., Dumont A.S. Hyperperfusion syndrome following endovascular cerebral revascularization. A review. Neurosurg. Forum. 2009; 26: E4. DOI: 10.3171.2009.1.FOCUS08276
  54. Lieb M., Shah U., Hines G.L. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid intervention: A review. Cardiol. Rev. 2012; 20: 84–89. DOI: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e318237eef8
  55. Farooq M.U., Goushganian C., Min J., Gorelik P.B. Pathophysiology and management of reperfusion injury and hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Exp. Transl. Stroke Med. 2016; 8: 7. DOI: 10.1186/s13231-016-0021-2
Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.

Наиболее читаемые статьи этого автора (авторов)