Differences in the views of obstetricians-gynecologists and intensivists based on the survey “Provision of medical care to patients with stillbirth”. Original article
#2021-1
PDF_2021-1_116-122 (Русский)
PDF_2021-1_116-122
HTML_2021-1_116-122 (Русский)
HTML_2021-1_116-122

Keywords

stillbirth
pregnant women
labor pain
parturition
fetus
postpartum period
surveys
questionnaires

How to Cite

Mysovskaya Y.S., Marshalov D.V., Shifman E.M., Shindyapina N.V., Ioscovich A. Differences in the views of obstetricians-gynecologists and intensivists based on the survey “Provision of medical care to patients with stillbirth”. Original article. Annals of Critical Care. 2021;(1):116–122. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2021-1-116-122.

Statistic

Abstract Views: 59
PDF_2021-1_116-122 (Русский) Downloads: 7
PDF_2021-1_116-122 Downloads: 0
HTML_2021-1_116-122 (Русский) Downloads: 2
HTML_2021-1_116-122 Downloads: 1
Statistic from 21.01.2023

Abstract

Introduction. The Russian Federation’s stillbirth rate is almost twice that of the United States and Europe, while domestic treatment protocols are still lacking.

Objectives. To analyze the results of a survey of obstetricians-gynecologists and intensivists on the problems of providing medical care to patients with stillbirth.

Materials and methods. We have developed a questionnaire, which consisted of 23 questions in Russian. A total of 369 Russian-speaking doctors, intensivists and obstetricians-gynecologists took part in the survey.

Results. The need to turn off the mother’s consciousness at the time of giving birth to a dead fetus caused great disagreement between the related specialists (p = 0.0001). 56 % of intensivists and 35 % of obstetricians-gynecologists were in favor of turning off the mother’s consciousness. According to 23 % of obstetricians-gynecologists and only 9 % of intensivists, visual and tactile contact of a mother and her dead fetus has a positive impact on the psychoemotional state of the woman (p = 0.002). Respondents from both specialties preferred epidural analgesia in more than half of the cases.

Conclusions. A list of issues for which the greatest differences in ratings were obtained has been identified, which will further help to identify priority issues for discussion and points of application for creating agreed documents on the best management of pregnant women with stillbirth.

https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2021-1-116-122
PDF_2021-1_116-122 (Русский)
PDF_2021-1_116-122
HTML_2021-1_116-122 (Русский)
HTML_2021-1_116-122

References

  1. Здравоохранение в России. 2019: Стат. Сб./Росстат. М., 2019. [Zdravookhranenie v Rossii. 2019: Stat. Sb./Rosstat. M., 2019. (In Russ)]
  2. Население и социальные индикаторы стран СНГ и отдельных стран мира 2014–2017. Межгосударственный статистический комитет СНГ. М, 2018. [Naselenie i sotsial’nye indikatory stran SNG i otdel’nykh stran mira 2014–2017. Mezhgosudarstvennyi statisticheskii komitet SNG. Moscow, (In Russ)]
  3. DiMiceli-Zsigmond M., Williams A.K., Richardson M.G. Expecting the Unexpected. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015; 121(2): 457–464. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000785
  4. Eysenbach G. Correction: Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2012; 14(1): e8. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2042
  5. Burns K.E., Duffett M., Kho M.E., et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ. 2008; 179(3): 245– DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080372
  6. Kelley K., Clark B., Brown V., Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003; 15(3): 261–266. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031
  7. Мысовская Ю.С., Маршалов Д.В., Шифман Е.М., Шиндяпина Н.В. Медицинское и психологическое сопровождение женщин с мертворождением в перинатальном периоде: национальное исследование. Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. 2020; 14(4): 176–184. DOI: 10.17816/1993-6508-2020-25-3-176-184 [Mysovskaya Yu.S., Marshalov D.V., Shifman E.M., Shindyapina N.V. Meditsinskoe i psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie zhenshchin v perinatal’nom periode: natsional’noe issledovanie. Regionarnaya anesteziya i lechenie ostroi boli. 2020; 14(4): 176–184. DOI:17816/1993-6508-2020-25-3-176-184. (In Russ)]
  8. Bennett S.M., Litz B.T., Maguen S., Ehrenreich J.T. An Exploratory Study of the Psychological Impact and Clinical Care of Perinatal Loss. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 2008; 13(6): 485–510. DOI: 10.1080/15325020802171268
  9. Christiansen D.M. Posttraumatic stress disorder in parents following infant death: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2017; 51: 60–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.007
  10. Gravensteen I., Helgadottir L., Jacobsen E., et al. Women’s experiences in relation to stillbirth and risk factors for long-term post-traumatic stress symptoms: a retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(10). DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003323
  11. Ryninks K., Roberts-Collins C., McKenzie-McHarg K., Horsch A. Mothers’ experience of their contact with their stillborn infant: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014; 14(1). DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-203
  12. Monostori D., Dombi E., Zelena A. Wrong communication panels for perinatal loss. Orvosi hetilap. 2018; 159(25): 1033– DOI: 10.1556/650.2018.31006
  13. Queensland Clinical Guideline: Stillbirth care. 2019. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/143087/g-stillbirth.pdf
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 ANNALS OF CRITICAL CARE