Analysis of criminal cases against doctors of surgical specialties on the article “Causing death by negligence due to improper performance of the person’s professional duties”
#2020-4
PDF_2020-04_134-142 (Русский)
HTML_2020-04_134-142 (Русский)

Keywords

surgeon
anesthesiologist-resuscitator
obstetrician-gynecologist
court decisions
defects in medical care
restriction of freedom
admission of guilt

How to Cite

Gorbachev V.I., Netesin E.S., Gorbacheva S.M., Sumin S.A., Khamidulin M.V., Utkin N.N. Analysis of criminal cases against doctors of surgical specialties on the article “Causing death by negligence due to improper performance of the person’s professional duties”. Annals of Critical Care. 2022;(4):134–142. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-134-142.

Statistic

Abstract Views: 100
PDF_2020-04_134-142 (Русский) Downloads: 17
HTML_2020-04_134-142 (Русский) Downloads: 52
Statistic from 21.01.2023

Abstract

Introduction. Currently, there is a serious increase in complaints from citizens to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. Accordingly, there has been an increase in criminal cases initiated against medical workers. The group of specialists of maximum risk includes, first of all, doctors of surgical specialties: surgeons; anesthesiologists-resuscitators; obstetricians-gynecologists.

Objectives. Analyze the criminal cases against surgeons initiated under the second part of Article 109 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Materials and methods. The search for criminal cases was carried out in the following electronic databases: Court decisions of the Russian Federation (https://court decisions.rf) and the state automated system of the Russian Federation “Justice” (https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/portal.html), the search depth was — the last five years.

Results. Found 235 court decisions in cases open under Part 2. Art. 109 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. An assessment of territorial and gender characteristics was carried out. Defects in the provision of medical care identified by the courts and incriminated to doctors are presented. The attitude of doctors of surgical specialties to the charges brought and the applied terms of the main types of punishment are presented: restriction of freedom and deprivation of the right to engage in medical activities. Attention is drawn to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances used by the courts.

Conclusions. The most problematic moments in the treatment of patients in the presented surgical specialties are invasive manipulations and surgical interventions.

https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2020-4-134-142
PDF_2020-04_134-142 (Русский)
HTML_2020-04_134-142 (Русский)

References

  1. Сазонов А.И. «Персональная ответственность медицинских работников за преступления, связанные с оказанием медицинской помощи и медицинских услуг» в рамках цикла «Правовые этюды в медицине» [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://nacmedpalata.ru/?action = show&id = 28510. Ссылка активна на 05.10.2020. [Sazonov A.I. “Personal’naya otvetstvennost’ medicinskih rabotnikov za prestupleniya, svyazannye s okazaniem medicinskoj pomoshchi i medicinskih uslug” v ramkah cikla “Pravovye etyudy v medicine” [Elektronnyj resurs]. Available from: https://nacmedpalata.ru/?action = show&id = 28510 (accessed 5.10.2020). (In Russ)]
  2. Письмо председателя Следственного комитета РФ от 01.02.2019. № исх. СК 226/1-3267-19/84. Криминалистическая характеристика преступлений, связанных с ненадлежащим оказанием медицинской помощи [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://kgv-crb.ru/index. php/25-sotrudniku/187-kriminalisticheskaya — kharakteristika prestuplenij svyazannykh s nenadlezhashchim okazaniem meditsinskoj pomoshchi i meditsinskikh uslug. Ссылка активна на 23.01.2020. [Pis’mo predsedatelya Sledstvennogo komiteta RF ot 01.02.2019. № iskh. SK 226/1-3267-19/84. Kriminalisticheskaya harakteristika prestuplenij, svyazannyh s nenadlezhashchim okazaniem medicinskoj pomoshchi [Elektronnyj resurs]. Available from: http://kgv-crb.ru/index. php/25-sotrudniku/187-kriminalisticheskaya — kharakteristika prestuplenij svyazannykh s nenadlezhashchim okazaniem meditsinskoj pomoshchi i meditsinskikh uslug (accessed 23.01.2020). (In Russ)]
  3. Государственная автоматизированная система Российской Федерации «Правосудие» [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/portal.html. Ссылка активна на 14.08.2020. [Gosudarstvennaya avtomatizirovannaya sistema Rossijskoj Federacii “Pravosudie”. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Available from: https://bsr.sudrf.ru/bigs/portal.html (accessed 14.08.2020). (In Russ)]
  4. Судебные решения РФ [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://судебные решения.рф. Ссылка активна на 14.08.2020. [Sudebnye resheniya RF [Elektronnyj resurs]. Available from: http://court decisions.rf (accessed 14.08.2020). (In Russ)]
  5. Судебная статистика РФ [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://stat.апи-пресс.рф/stats/ug/t/14/s/17. Ссылка активна на 05.10.2020. [Sudebnaya statistika RF [Elektronnyj resurs]. Available from: http://stat.apipress.rf/stats/ug/t/14/s/17 (accessed 05.10.2020). (In Russ)]
  6. Нетесин Е.С., Горбачев В.И. Некоторые аспекты участия анестезиологов-реаниматологов в судебно-медицинских экспертизах. Медицинское право. 2019; 5: 33–43. [Netesin E.S., Gorbachev V.I. Nekotorye aspekty uchastiya anesteziologov-reanimatologov v sudebno-medicinskih ekspertizah. Medicinskoe pravo. 2019; 5: 33–43. (In Russ)]
  7. Горбачев В.И., Нетесин Е.С., Козлов А.И. и др. Аналитический обзор по уголовным делам против врачей анестезиологов-реаниматологов за последние пять лет. Вестник интенсивной терапии им. А.И. Салтанова. 2020; 1: 19–24. [Gorbachev V.I., Netesin E.S., Kozlov A.I., et al. Analytical review on criminal cases against doctors anesthesiologists-reanimatologists for the last five years. Article. Annals of Critical Care. 2020; 1: 19–24. (In Russ)] DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2020-1-19-24
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.